BRAVE: I’ll Be Shooting for My Own Hand


Brave (2012) – The 13th Pixar Animated Feature – Directed by Mark Andrews and Brenda Chapman – Starring Kelly Macdonald, Julie Walters, Billy Connolly, Emma Thompson, Kevin McKidd, Craig Ferguson, Robbie Coltrane, and John Ratzenberger.

In seemingly every conversation I’ve had about BRAVE over the past few months, or in things I’ve heard people say in person, on Facebook or in the theater, the idea has come up that Meridia (Kelly Macdonald) signals some kind of dramatic shift in the “Disney Princess.” People have said things like, they’ll “finally allow a Disney Princess into their house,” or that Disney has “finally made a positive Princess.” That’s all fine and good – it’s not my intent to tell you how to raise your kids, or point out there there are obviously several Disney Princess movies you’ve either not seen or critically misread.

I am here to say that I’ve just about had it with Meridia being called a Disney Princess. I know this probably matters to almost no one and I realize that given Disney owns Pixar that whatever Pixar does is Disney’s, but I like to think that there’s still a separation between what it means to be a “Disney film” and what it means to be a “Pixar film,” even if John Lasseter is now Chief Creative Officer for Walt Disney Animation and some college kid is probably already or soon to get paid to walk around Disney World in a Meridia costume. Perhaps over time a Disney film and a Pixar film will simply become the same thing, but for now, they’re different.

Disney acknowledges this, too. Despite all the talk about Meridia joining the ranks (as of BRAVE’s release, the Wikipedia page for Disney Princesses even mentions its expected, so you know it’s true), Disney’s official Princess site has yet to list Meridia among the ranks.

All of this Disney Princessification of Meridia rubs me wrong, too, because it completely ignores the very excellent TANGLED from two years ago, a film that wonderfully embraced the Disney Princess past while admitting its flaws and decidedly pushing it forward, too. Rapunzel is a great character and TANGLED is a great movie.

In fact, it’s a better movie than BRAVE.

That is not to say that BRAVE is a bad movie, because it is not a bad movie. It’s a good but not great movie. It’s enjoyable and moving, but it also feels oddly derivative and small. With all of the sweeping vistas and epic set-up, the movie’s ultimate focus on a daughter and her mom learning to put aside their differences and find a middle ground – while the mom has been transformed into a bear (we’ll get to it) – is touching but … lacking.

None of this is Meridia’s fault. The Pixar braintrust (so many people write, produce, direct, and generally have a say in these Pixar films it’s hard to think of them as belonging to a singular individual) has created a really great character. The daughter of a Scottish King, Meridia is a Middle Ages version of a tomboy caught by societal expectations.

Meaning, her mother.

All Meridia wants to do is shoot arrows and ride her horse Angus. All her mother wants her to do is be a proper princess – act like a lady, wear fancy clothes, tame her wild hair, and get married to protect the unity of the four clans. Queen Elinor (Emma Thompson) arranges for a contest to be held to marry Meridia off to one of the first-born sons of the other clans. King Fergus (Billy Connolly) is the kind of king who wants to not be bothered with unpleasant things; he loves his daughter and encourages her wild ways, but also doesn’t want to anger Elinor.

The relationship between Elinor and Fergus is a bit of a letdown because it feels like they’ve come out of Sitcom Casting 101 – he’s the loud, boorish, infantile, man and she’s the woman who’s way too good for him. I expect a bit more out of Pixar than to have their characters feel like discarded ideas for Tim Allen, James Belushi, and Kevin James sitcoms. (There’s a hint that the film is going to get into why these women marry these losers when Elinor indicates her own betrothal was not the most ideal of happenings, but then it just lets it fade away.) It’s nice that the focus here is on the child-parent relationship instead of on the husband-wife relationship, but that brings up another reverberation I felt while watching BRAVE.

How To Train Your Dragon takes this same premise of parents trying to pigeonhole their kids into a societal norm, and delivers a much better film.

In the best sequence of the film, Meridia is beside herself at the idea that she’s going to be forced into a marriage with a kid who wins her at a contest, so using the rules to her advantage, she declares herself an entrant in the contest (after she declared the contest would be archery), and “wins” herself. This sends everyone into a tizzy, of course, which leads to Meridia jumping on Angus and taking off for the forest. She comes across a will-o’-the-wisp, which blaze a trail to a witch’s hut, where Meridia gets a potion that will change her mother, and therefore change her own fate.

This is how her mother gets changed into a bear. What occurs from here out is that Meridia has to care for her mother as she tries to undo the damage she’s done. There’s some really nice, really touching scenes between the two as the proper mother is forced to learn how to catch fish. They’ve only got two days to undo the spell by mending the bond that was severed, which Meridia takes to mean fixing the tapestry that she sliced into during a fight with her mom, but really means (or also means, if you prefer) that they need to mend the damage between them and realize they love each other and accept each other, and it’s actually all very touching.

But it’s just not particularly memorable. The mother-daughter bonding is quite nice, but it serves to make the King-clan stuff come off as nonsense. The clans are all mad because no one is telling them what’s going on and Fergus is rather clueless, and all of them feel completely antithetical to Meridia and Elinor in nearly every way, including the most important: the ladies feel like real people and the men feel like what would happen if Vince Vaughn, Ben Stiller, Will Ferrell, and Danny McBride decided to remake Rob Roy. The film would have been better without them.

There’s a back story here of a big, angry bear that was tricked by the witch a long, long time ago but it only really seems to exist so that we can have a big final action sequence.

All of this sounds rather negative, but this doesn’t mean that BRAVE is a bad movie. It has a good message about parents needing to let their kids find their own way, and kids needing to understand that parents are often right, and it’s a solid end that Meridia ends up re-establishing her familial bonds instead of simply gaining a boyfriend. It’s an enjoyable enough movie, with Meridia’s triplet brothers providing some comedy as they’re always playing pranks and getting turned into bears and generally being a nuisance. It’s a stunningly beautiful movie, too, as Pixar’s animation techniques remain at the top of the class. Yet, there’s something off here, too, and the result is a movie I enjoyed watching but neither thrilled me nor challenged me.

BRAVE simply feels too simple, too safe, too unoriginal.

Maybe Meridia is a better character than some of the Disney Princesses, but she’s not in an entirely different class, either. For all of her talk of being independent and not wanting to conform to society’s expectations, after her mother is turned into a bear Meridia becomes the embodiment of those stereotypical gender roles: she becomes a caregiver, she sews, she cooks, and at the end they even damsel-in-distress her, as it’s her mother (in bear form) who defeats the mean, angry bear. The movie’s message that you can be yourself and conform to expected gender roles isn’t a bad one, but it’s not exactly a rousing one, either. I enjoyed that BRAVE didn’t simply give us a “kid is right, parent is wrong” story, and that as much as she conforms to gender roles to help her mom, her mother also sees that there’s real value in Meridia’s atypical abilities to hunt and shoot and be independent.

It speaks to the high quality of Pixar’s films that BRAVE is closer to the studios worst film than its best because any company would be proud to produce BRAVE. For Pixar, though, BRAVE is a bit of a disappointment. This is a good movie, but not a great one, and Pixar’s unbelievable success has led me to expect great ones.

BLACKADDER’S CHRISTMAS CAROL: The Queen Has Banned the Christmas

Blackadder’s Christmas Carol (1988) – Directed by Richard Boden – Starring Rowan Atkinson, Tony Robinson, Miranda Richardson, Stephen Fry, Hugh Laurie, Robbie Coltrane, Miriam Margolyes, Jim Broadbent, and Nicola Bryant.

If you have not seen BLACKADDER’S CHRISTMAS CAROL, you should take 45 minutes out of your day and go watch it. There are three reasons why if you only see one adaptation of Charles Dickens’ non-cricket starring Christmas story this season, it should be this one.

Reason #1: It’s really funny. BLACKADDER was the coolest comedy back in the day, and it still holds up remarkably well. Rowan Atkinson sits at the center of a merry cast of characters, and he’s able to mold each different iteration of Blackadder to that time period’s different cast of characters, while still managing to be a pretty big assh*le in each one. (If you haven’t seen BLACKADDER, each season of the show sees the series recast in a different time period from British history.) In this version, Blackadder is the nicest guy in London, and on Christmas Eve everyone comes in and takes advantage of his generosity, leaving him penniless. Atkinson and Tony Robinson play extremely well off each other and the episode’s funny is derived largely from their relationship.

Reason #2: The big name stars. Nearly everyone here is someone you’ll recognize: Hugh Laurie, Stephen Fry, Miranda Richardson, Jim Broadbent, Robbie Coltrane … heck even Doctor Who’s Companion Peri (Nicola Bryant) makes an appearance. Double heck, it was co-written by Richard Curtis, who you know as the guy who wrote Love Actually and “Vincent and the Doctor.”

Reason #3: This is a really well-done and executed adaptation that sees the traditional story flipped on its lid. Instead of the Scrooge character being a wretched human being that gets set straight by the Ghosts of Christmas, the Scrooge character (Blackadder) is actually the nicest guy in London. Everyone takes advantage of him, and his yearly profits of seventeen pounds and one penny walk out the door in donations on Christmas Eve. Heck, even his Christmas bird and bowl of nuts get taken away from him.

Blackadder doesn’t mind, though, as he puts a positive spin on everything. He heads to bed and he’s visited by the Spirit of Christmas (Robbie Coltrane), who just wants to pop in and pop out because Blackadder is such a nice guy there’s nothing to show him. Blackadder convinces the Spirit to do the whole deal, so he shows him scenes from the past. We see the series versions of Blackadder, and the Christmas Blackadder sees how his ancestors were rather reprehensible. Instead of thinking better of himself, however, he begins to admire them. As awful as his ancestors are, they weren’t taken advantage of the way Christmas Blackadder has been abused by the locals.

The Spirit of Christmas is horrified and doesn’t want to show Blackadder the future, but he relents and does. In one version of the future, Christmas Blackadder becomes this super space-faring bad ass; in the version where he continues to be nice, he becomes the sidekick.

So he decides to become a dick, and ends up blowing his opportunity to gain a fortune and a royal title from Queen Vic.

It’s a great inversion of the original tale, and makes for a satisfying final twist to a very satisfying special.

Be sure to check out the Holiday Review Index for all the Holiday-themed reviews to be found at Atomic Anxiety.

GOLDENEYE: Someday You’ll Have to Make Good On Your Innuendos

GoldenEye (1995) – The 17th James Bond Film; The 1st (of 4) Pierce Brosnan Films – Directed by Martin Campbell – Starring Pierce Brosnan, Sean Bean, Izabella Scorupco, Famke Janssen, Alan Cumming, Judi Dench, Joe Don Baker, Robbie Coltrane, and Desmond Llewelyn.

M: You don’t like me, Bond. You don’t like my methods. You think I’m an accountant, a bean counter more interested in my numbers than your instincts.

Bond: The thought had occurred to me.

M: Good. Because I think you’re a sexist, misogynist dinosaur. A relic of the Cold War, whose boyish charms, though lost on me, obviously appealed to that young girl I sent out to evaluate you.

Bond: Point taken.

M: Not quite, 007. If you think I don’t have the balls to send a man out to die, your instincts are dead wrong. I’ve no compunction about sending you to your death. But I won’t do it on a whim. Even with your cavalier attitude towards life. I want you to find GoldenEye, find out who took it and what they plan to do with it, and stop it. And if you should come across Ourumov, guilty or not, I don’t want you running off on some vendetta. Avenging Alec Trevelyan will not bring him back.

Bond: You didn’t get him killed.

M: Neither did you. Don’t make it personal.

Bond: Yes, ma’am. [turns to leave]

M: Bond. [Bond stop and turns to her] Come back alive.

(Taken from Wikiquote’s GoldenEye page.)

LICENSE TO KILL addressed fears that James Bond was ready to be put out to pasture by jamming him into a period-piece revenge flick. GOLDENEYE addresses the same concern head-on. The verbal sparring session between Bond and M quoted above is played brilliantly by Judi Dench and Pierce Brosnan, and it clearly lays out their positions – we have the older woman with the new age ideals on espionage versus the younger man with the previous age’s belief system. She doesn’t like him because he’s a reminder of what used to be and he doesn’t like her because she’s a reminder of what’s coming. The exchange nicely sets up who James Bond is in terms of the picture we’re watching.

The sequence does so much more, too, because it addresses that idea floating around out here in the real world that James Bond is no longer relevant in a post-Cold War world, and then spends the next 90 minutes proving that he’s as important as ever.

GOLDENEYE is a very good movie and it’s the first Bond film since THE SPY WHO LOVED ME that crackles with the kind of professional confidence that comes from having the right actor and the right director and the right script. Director Martin Campbell brings an assured hand to the helm that’s been lacking. Directors John Glen, Lewis Gilbert, and Guy Hamilton were all completely competent, but they all feel like house directors – they shoot competent movies in the preferred style and stay out of the way. It’s like they’re all shooting from the same playbook, which was probably the case. Obviously, they were all doing what the producers wanted because they all kept getting asked back, but Campbell is clearly a level or two above their skill set.

Unlike his predecessors, Campbell knows where to put his camera for maximum effect. A camera isn’t just placed HERE because it allows us to see everything important in this scene, but because this is the best place to give that next scene its biggest possible impact. I don’t mean to suggest that Campbell is channeling Sam Raimi’s Quick and the Dead style, either. There’s a term used to describe some players in baseball – “professional hitter.” The term means you’re not a superstar but you’re going to do what you’re supposed to based on the pitch and the situation. You’re not going to try to pull the outside pitch with a runner on first because that’s going to lead to a double play. You might do that with 2 strikes on you and a runner on 2nd or 3rd with less than 2 outs because that’s going to advance the runner.

That’s what Campbell is when it comes to directing – a professional. His camera is always in the right place. If a scene needs a simple shot, he gives it a simple shot. If a scene will be helped by putting a camera inside a Russian tank for a 2-second shot of Bond ducking inside the tank, then Campbell puts a camera there and gets that shot, too.

Campbell knows how to mix his close-ups and long-shots to make action scenes really pop. Shooting the tank chase scene and the one-on-one fisticuffs between 007 and 006 require different techniques and Campbell delivers on both accounts. The tank chase constantly shifts from close to long, from facial shots to spinning wheels, while constantly letting you feel the power at play and appreciate the coolness of it all.

It’s a fantastic chase sequence – imaginative and fun and aided by a rare GOLDENEYE appearance of the Bond theme, it’s the moment where Pierce Brosnan really becomes James Bond as it shows off Bond’s ability to improvise on the run and never lose his cool.

And that’s really what makes GOLDENEYE an exciting movie to watch – Brosnan and the producers clearly know who they want this Bond to be and they go out and make a film around that idea of this alleged relic, live-in-the-moment, professional spy. They parallel Bond not so much with 006 but with General Ourumov, a Russian General who was clearly more happy being a Soviet General. He has a scene similar to Bond’s frank discussion with M but where Bond’s decision is to put the job first, Ourumov puts himself first and sides with 006 to steal the GoldenEye weapon that Russia has developed.

Sean Bean plays 006/Alec Trevelyan/Janus, and he’s got a semi-complicated backstory that’s fitting for this post-Cold War era. His parents were among the Cossacks that fought with the Nazis during World War 2, then blah blah blah. It’s nice of them to include an actual motivation but really what it comes down to is Bond’s condemnation of Alec: “A worldwide financial meltdown, all so mad little Alec can settle a score with the world 50 years on.”

“Please,” Alec fires back, “spare me the Freud. I might as well ask if all those vodka martinis silence the screams of the men you’ve killed. Or if you find forgiveness in the arms of all those willing women … for all the dead ones you failed to protect.”

I think GOLDENEYE would have worked better if the producers built around the 006/007 conflict a bit more, but it pulls the 006 is Dead!-Gotcha!-006 is the Real Bad Buy! card instead. Bean and Brosnan make good enemies and when they’re on screen together GOLDENEYE works better than when they’re not, but the film never really develops Alec’s character, preferring to turn him into the kind of villain that forces himself on a woman because he’s mad that she’s Bond’s girl.

They do the sugar and spice routine with the women but I didn’t find either of them overly memorable in a good way. Natalya (Izabella Scorupco) is the doe-eyed computer programmer who eventually melts for Bond and Xenia (Famke Janssen) kills people by squeezing them to death with her knees. I suppose the idea is that it’s a new day and age so we need a woman who’s sexually aggressive and likes to gun people down (her machine gun rampage is similar to Chris Walken’s gundown back in A VIEW TO A KILL), but it doesn’t totally work for me.

Joe Don Baker is back but this time around he’s playing a CIA agent and not an arms dealer. He’s here to provide some comic relief and he delivers a few chuckles without becoming overbearing. His line to Bond about him being “just another stiff-assed Brit” and the way he’s totally willing to help but nonetheless plays the “I’m not here” game works because the filmmakers don’t oversell it.

The playfulness with Moneypenny is back in full force although with a contemporary twist. As she and Bond engage in their usual banter, Moneypenny tells him, “Someday you’ll have to make good on your innuendos” a few lines after telling Bond that his behavior could qualify as sexual harrasment. It’s another subtle, but effective indication that it’s a new day and age and while we can’t really call Moneypenny’s behavior aggressive, it’s certainly a sign that she knows where all the lines are drawn and is letting Bond know she knows how to navigate them.

The Eric Serra score is atrocious, and apparently the producers knew it, too, because they brought someone else in to re-score the tank-chase scene. The Tina Turner theme song (written by the half of U2 you know) is really pretty good and the opening titles are some of the best in a long time.

As for Brosnan, he’s very good here, managing to be both confident in his own abilities and yet always aware that he’s standing on a continually shifting geopolitical ground.

Taken as a whole, GOLDENEYE is a very good action movie with plenty of innovate action sequences (the opening bungee jump is still cool even if we’ve all realized that bungee jumping isn’t) and a cool-under-pressure Bond. Instead of feeling like a relic, GOLDENEYE feels confident and assured. Where some of the recent Bond movies have felt like they were trying to fit into their contemporary cinematic landscape, GOLDENEYE simply feels like they set out to make a good movie that’s aware of the political landscape but not beholden to whatever was popular in the theaters the year before.