DAREDEVIL: How Do You Kill A Man Without Fear?

Daredevil (2003; Director’s Cut) – Directed by Mark Steven Johnson – Starring Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner, Colin Farrell, Michael Clarke Duncan, Jon Favreau, Joe Pantoliano, David Keith, Leland Orser, Erick Avari, Ellen Pompeo, Derrick O’Connor, Jude Ciccolella, Kevin Smith, Frank Miller, and Stan Lee.

If you haven’t seen the Director’s Cut of DAREDEVIL, then you haven’t seen DAREDEVIL, because the Director’s Cut is thisclose to being included among the best of all the Marvel movies.

When the theatrical release hit theaters back in 2003, I went and watched it, and kinda liked it. I didn’t love it, but I didn’t think it was bad, and I didn’t think many of the arrows people were slinging at the film were fair: the costume, the water coffin, the fact that Michael Clarke Duncan is black. I never thought the costume was a major drawback, I thought the water coffin was actually a decent idea, and I’m much more interested in actors getting the spirit of a character than I am concerned with nailing the look.

There were other problems with the theatrical cut, however, as the emphasis on the Elektra (Jennifer Garner) subplot turned DAREDEVIL into a more traditional superhero movie and robbed the film of what made Daredevil unique. I don’t think alteration of source material is, in and of itself, a bad thing, and Daredevil has, at various stages in his comic book life, been portrayed in a more traditionally superheroic sense, so it’s not the portrayal itself that bothers me, but that in doing so, it put DAREDEVIL in the company of Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man and Bryan Singer’s X-Men and X2, and in comparison to those films, Mark Steven Johnson’s theatrical take on the Man Without Fear fell short.

The Director’s Cut, however, offers a darker, more serious, more unique superhero story, and is much better for it. We’ve become so accustomed to movie studios slapping “Director’s Cut” on DVDs and Blu-rays where the movie isn’t noticeably different than the theatrical cut that we’ve almost become inoculated to the idea that the Director’s Cut could be something significantly different, and DAREDEVIL’s Director’s Cut is a definite and significant improvement. Because the film had a lukewarm reception on its release, the film has slipped through the cracks a bit, and the release of the Director’s Cut hasn’t fully impacted the cultural perception of this movie, and as a result I am pretty comfortable in saying that the Director’s Cut of DAREDEVIL currently stands as the most under-appreciated superhero movie ever made.

I love DAREDEVIL, and the reasons why it falls just short of the very best superhero movies is the execution of the idea in several spots, and not the idea, itself.

How could DAREDEVIL has been just that little bit better? Ben Affleck could be who he is now, as an actor, instead of who he was then. Colin Farrell could have toned down Bullseye’s kewl and been more the driven killer that he is in the second half of the movie. Mark Steven Johnson could have had his movie shot with a little more grit and a little less slick. And Jennifer Garner …

I am not a totally unkind person, and if doing this movie is where Affleck and Garner fell in love … well, if the trade off for love is a bad performance, then that is a small price to pay. But it doesn’t alter my belief that Garner’s performance here is simply not very good, and the de-emphasis of her character in the longer Director’s Cut helps to make DAREDEVIL a better film.

DAREDEVIL opens in the present, with a busted up Daredevil clinging to the cross on top of a church. He lowers himself in and the cathedral’s priest (Derrick O’Connor) offers him some comfort before we drop into an extended flashback that gives us Matt Murdock’s origin as a child. As anyone who’s been reading these reviews knows, I’m not overly fond of origin stories, yet the presentation here is exceedingly well done. What helps is that the story of young Matt (Scott Terra) is a self-contained story about a boy, his dad, and a fateful decision by the father to buck the mob. David Keith is excellent as Jack Murdock, a down on his luck fighter that’s been working for the mob as an enforcer. When Matt catches him roughing someone up, he runs away and gets blinded by radioactive chemicals. Father and son make a bond with each other to start attacking life, and this thread ends with Jack refusing to throw a fight, which gets him killed.

It’s a concisely told, effectively rendered short story at the beginning of the film, and it does an excellent job setting not only the violent tone for what follows, but also demonstrates there’s a real consequence to people’s actions.

Cut to the near present where the bulk of the film takes place. We don’t return to the moment in the church that we left and the film doesn’t end on that moment, either. Now, that’s not a huge break in chronology, but it helps to give DAREDEVIL a little something extra in the presentation of the narrative.

The primary difference between the Director’s Cut and the theatrical cut is the inclusion of a subplot that features Coolio and Jude Ciccolella. While it doesn’t dramatically alter the film because of how it enhances the scenes that made the theatrical cut, it adds to the overall tone of the film by having an honest-to-goodness legal subplot. No longer is Matt Murdock and Foggy Nelson bit players in Daredevil’s film, but they’re actual characters in the larger story. It’s important to see the Matt persona at work, as it increases the tension between what he does as a member of the Court and what he does as a vigilante. With all of these extra legal scenes put into the narrative, we get a much greater sense of Matt’s frustrations with the legal system.

There’s a fantastic scene between Matt and Officer McKensie where Matt loses it. He uses his increased sense of hearing to help determine if people are lying by listening to their heartbeat, and he’s frustrated at how both his client (Coolio) and the main witness against him (Ciccolella) are telling different versions of the same story, yet both appear to be telling the truth. Matt goes after McKensie, but as Matt and not Daredevil. The officer is obviously confused about being roughed up by the blind attorney, but after Matt bangs up his car and rips open McKensie’s shirt, he sees a scar that tells him the cop has a pacemaker, and thus his heartbeat wouldn’t be affected by lying.

It’s good stuff and it shows the failing of a superpower, something that’s not often done unless it’s a total breakdown in powers. This isn’t that; instead, Matt’s powers are in full effect, but they fail him because he’s become over-reliant on them. It’s a small touch but it adds a nice sense of pathos to the film without taking control of the narrative.

At a coffee shop one morning, Matt and Foggy (Jon Favreau) are having their morning jolt, arguing about the alleged veracity of Daredevil and giant alligators in the sewers of New York. There’s great chemistry between Favreau and Affleck, and one of the film’s better touches is how Foggy will try to lie and trick Matt by using Matt’s blindness against him, suck as when he tricks Matt into dumping mustard into his coffee. The trick is on Foggy, of course, as Matt is fully aware of what his friend is trying to pull, and when the opportunity presents itself in the arrival of Elektra Natchios (Garner), Matt switches their cups so Foggy gets the mustard blend.

Matt decides to try his hand at flirting with Elektra, who’s not having any of it. Matt pursues her down the street, where they engage in some painful banter and then do a much more effective form of banter when they start punching and kicking each other over a kid’s playground. On the whole, the scene doesn’t work for me, but what does work is that it’s nice to see that Matt has a life outside of being Daredevil. And yeah, he’s not good at personal relationships, but there’s a genuine spark of life when he goes after Elektra. He’s not doing this as cover, but because he likes chasing after a pretty lady.

Good for him, and good for including that in this film. Mark Steven Johnson doesn’t appear to have any delusions of grandeur here, nor any shame in directing a superhero movie; he’s just trying to tell the very best Daredevil story he can tell.

Matt’s life is interrupted when the Kingpin (Duncan) hires Irish assassin Bullseye (Farrell) to kill Elektra’s dad, who wants out of the criminal business. Bullseye kills Elektra’s dad with Daredevil’s billy club/walking stick/grappling hook, which gets Elektra to think that Daredevil is to blame. With her father dead, Elektra does what every daughter would do in this situation: she goes home, puts on some tight leather, sets up some sandbags, arms herself with a pair of sais, cuts open the sandbags as she’s twirling and kicking around the room, and then goes after Daredevil.

DD, of course, doesn’t want to fight her, but that doesn’t stop Elektra from jamming a sai through his left shoulder, which causes Daredevil to do one of those slow slides down the wall. Matt decides now is the time to pull off his mask (because doing it before would have been silly), and Elektra instantly realizes that Daredevil couldn’t possibly be responsible because … because they made out? … and then Bullseye shows up and kills her. We get a really nice scene of Daredevil and Elektra crawling towards each other as the police move up through the building, and it’s one of the few scenes between them that really works.

The action sequences in the film are solid without being exceptional, though I really like how the film depicts Matt’s radar sense (though I would have gone with a dark red echo effect instead of blue to better fit the film’s color scheme). I do like how Johnson takes advantage of his locations – there’s a fight on the rooftops and another inside a church – but he’s not very adept at showing people punching and kicking each other. The film uses some special effects to make the three principals jump higher and stuff and it looks really silly. Daredevil, Elektra, and Bullseye don’t need to be able to jump to a rooftop no one else can get to in order to be awesome. They’re already/always awesome.

Matt defeats Bullseye in the church fight and then goes after the Kingpin. Duncan is really good as the Kingpin; maybe it’s not the pure Wilson Fisk we’ve seen in the comics, but I love that he’s standing over this film, casting a huge shadow before entering the film as a real physical force in the final act. His dismissive line to his assistant that, “I was raised in the Bronx. This is something you wouldn’t understand,” as he readies himself for Daredevil’s arrival tells us more about the character than all the posturing ever could, just as Matt’s conflict over his Catholicism tells us he feels guilty about his actions as Daredevil much more effectively than him weakly telling a scared kid that, “I’m not the bad guy” ever could.

I really love the Director’s Cut of DAREDEVIL. While just short of that ultimate tier of Marvel films, this is an exceptionally good movie. It’s still a little too slick and the acting isn’t what it needs to be, but this darker DAREDEVIL is an under-appreciated and important superhero movie.

GREEN LANTERN: In Soulless Day, In Dullest Night


Green Lantern (Extended Cut, 2011) – Directed by Martin Campbell – Starring Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively, Peter Sarsgaard, Mark Strong, Angela Bassett, Temuera Morrison, Geoffrey Rush, Michael Clarke Duncan, Jon Tenney, Jay O. Sanders, Clancy Brown, and Tim Robbins.

GREEN LANTERN is a major disappointment, but not because it’s awful. Rather, it’s a disappointment because it’s so darn mediocre. Despite the action-directing acumen of Martin Campbell and the earnestness of Ryan Reynolds, LANTERN is a dull, lifeless movie that fronts so much heart it doesn’t notice it’s completely lacking in any kind of soul.

Green Lantern has always been my favorite DC character (I was a Marvel kid, but because of Steve Englehart’s writing and the awesomeness of the Green Lantern Corps, GL was my way into the DC Universe), Martin Campbell directed one of the greatest action movies of all time (Casino Royale), and I’ve liked Reynolds going back to his Two Guys, A Girl, and a Pizza Place days. Stars seemed to be aligning for Green Lantern to deliver an amazing cinematic experience: there’s the steady hand of a veteran director, a rising star looking for a franchise, the state of CGI film making has never been better, and there is no hero in comics more tailor-made for CGI than Green Lantern. Add to that the fact that both Campbell and Reynolds were genuinely stoked to be working on the film, with Reynolds taking great pains to assure longtime GL fans that this would be a film that respected the comics, and I was firmly behind the attempt …

Until that first trailer came out, and there was the dorky suit and the crappy CGI and I decided to stop looking at trailers and reading reviews. What I said about the trailer was this: “I do leave convinced that Reynolds is going to be great in this movie and I’m sure the CGI renderings will be cleaned up between now and then. [...] What we ultimately get in the first GREEN LANTERN trailer is the reassurance that the movie won’t suck without the promise of it actually being any good.”

Look, sometimes you watch a trailer and they’re deceiving, and sometimes they are exactly right, and in this case, it was pretty spot-in. My take on the LANTERN trailer is much more right than wrong; after seeing the film, I’d say Reynolds is very good instead of being great but LANTERN is a movie hits that forgettable middle.

GREEN LANTERN is a bit unique in that it’s not the trailer that’s deceptive – it’s the poster. Most of the movie posters and the Blu-ray/DVD packaging emphasize the Corps, but stare at the cover for 15 minutes and that’s just about as much Corps as you get in this movie. Astoundingly Earthbound, GREEN LANTERN’s visual packaging does everything it can to play up the Corps and outer space, yet the film does everything it can to stay AWAY from OA and the Lanterns. It’s a horrendous choice and speaks to just how confused Campbell, Reynolds, and the rest of the production and marketing staff are over what they want to do with this film.

Take Hal Jordan. He’s endearing because he’s a kid who sees his dad get blown up. Then he’s a scoundrel because he grows up, sleeps around and doesn’t take his job seriously. Then he’s a brilliant pilot. Then he’s a dick who screws up a test and ruins the company. Then he’s a great uncle. Then he’s whisked across the universe. Then he runs away. Then it turns out he didn’t ruin the company, after all. Then he saves lives. Then he’s dressed down by the woman he loves for being a coward. Then he admits he’s afraid. Then he’s all heart. I mean, all heart. He’s so all heart that he runs back to Oa and makes an impassioned appeal to the Guardians, and then he’s so all heart that he goes back to earth and makes an impassioned plea to Hector Hammond (Peter Sarsgaard) to not be mean, and none of it – absolutely none of it – feels like anything more than a random set of attitudes. It’s not character development as much as it is character contrivance.

And here’s the thing – Reynolds is good at all of it. He’s been doing snark for years but he does a surprisingly decent job doing heart, too. The problem is they push it too far, turning him too earnest too fast so that it just rings false. It’s compounded by having Hal be such a convert to earnestness that Reynolds comes off in the back-half of the movie as naive, or even brainwashed.

There’s a naive quality to the whole movie, like we’re trying to shoehorn the contemporary Green Lantern concept into some old-fashioned throwback idea. The good guys are super gorgeous and the bad guys are super ugly. The whole opening with Hal as a kid, and Carol Ferris as a kid, and Hector Hammond as a kid … it just doesn’t work. Especially since the big payoff is that Hal watches his dad (a test pilot for Ferris Industries) crash his jet and then, as Hal runs to the scene of the accident, beating everyone else, the jet blows up just as daddy is climbing out of the cockpit. It’s unusually cruel and, more damningly, there’s no effective payoff for it. (We even get to watch it in flashback about 15 minutes after we watch it the first time.)

There’s no effective payoff for anything in GREEN LANTERN. Hal watches his dad blow-up and then tries to live up to his dad’s legacy by never being afraid of anything. Of course, as Carol (Blake Lively) tells him, his dad was afraid, he was just good at hiding it. When Hal admits he gets afraid, too, that frees him up to become a hero. It’s a nice transitional moment but Hal’s transformation to Mr. Earnest just sort of happens instead of feeling like a breakthrough.

Another issue with the film is that the CGI is for crap. Almost all of the events in space (the few times we actually go to space) look completely phony. The opening sequence of the film introduces us to Parallax (voiced by Clancy Brown) looks like a cut sequence from a Halo knock-off, not a major motion picture. When Hal goes to Oa, it doesn’t look much better. Tomar Re (voiced by Geoffrey Rush) is the same. So’s Oa. It all looks incredibly cheap, stilted, and phony, and these ridiculous uniforms the Corps wears smacks of someone on the movie end deciding they could do it without wondering if they should.

The CGI does work in regards to the ring effects. Parallax looks good, too, once he gets to Earth, menacing Coast City like some alien Cthulu, but it’s not enough.

I realize it is a bit hypocritical of me to complain that the film doesn’t spend enough time in space at the same time I’m arguing that the space CGI looks cheap, but as I mentioned, it’s a conflicted film.

Back to the lack of payoffs: little ever comes back around to be worth our time in the first place. We see Hal, Carol, and Hector as kids and then see them as adults, but there’s no emotional connection between them. Hector reveals that he’s always been in love with Carol but that Hal got in the way, but it’s just a line. I don’t ever feel that Hector really loves Carol; I feel like his fascination with Carol is more a reflection of his general unhappiness at how his life turned out.

Which, to be honest, seems to be a general dissatisfaction with his own ugliness and awkwardness and failure to be loved by daddy (Tim Robbins).

Which brings me to Carol. I’ll say this for Blake Lively, she’s the only actor in the film who wholly belongs in the film. While everyone else is busy playing superhero or politician or intergalactic soldier (the GLC don’t do any cop things in the film) or crazy-head-expanding scientist, Lively seems to realize this is an absurdist story about a little boy in a man’s body struggling to please his absent father. Carol is a daddy’s girl pilot-slash-businesswoman (with no daddy issues) who’s into Hal yet continually frustrated/disappointed by him. I say “into” and not “in love with” because Hal and Carol demonstrate all the chemistry of two really good looking people who decided one day that they were always going to be the two most good looking people in any room they were ever going to be in, so they might as well have attractive person sex together. After Hal tells her about Oa, she doesn’t ask him, “Are you stoned?” She just accepts that he’s now part of an intergalactic police force and then scolds him for running away, yet again. The alien space cops don’t matter – running away does.

Lively delivers the best line in the movie; when Hal-as-GL shows up after he’s saved her life, Carol recognizes him. “How did you …?” “I’ve seen you naked,” she answers, “you think I’m not going to recognize you because I can’t see your cheekbones?” It’s a good line, but there’s not enough of them. Reynolds delivers a few early on when he’s in jerk/snark mode, but the film is so interested in getting him past that personification that there’s not enough of it.

Another big problem with LANTERN is that it doesn’t properly set-up its villains. We have a binary with Hal and Hector (the two little boys in adult bodies) but Hector’s not a real threat. He gets infected by a bit of Parallax’s yellow energy and gains the ability to hear other people’s thoughts. Then his skull starts expanding, turning him horrendously ugly. It’s so childish and old-fashioned and it doesn’t work because Hector’s not the real bad guy. He’s just the cinematic patsy to get Parallax to Earth.

Parallax as the villain doesn’t work, either, because the film spends loads of time telling us he’s the Big Bad and the biggest threat the Corps has ever faced, but then the Corps and the Guardians are all like, “You got this, Newbie,” when Hal comes and asks them for help. They decide they’ll make their stand someplace other than Earth and they’re completely willing to sacrifice Earth in the process.

No, really, that’s what they do.

Seriously, how does this make us like the Corps or the Guardians? Why would we want Hal to side up with these elitist space pigs?

I kept waiting for the Corps to realize the error of their ways and show up at Earth anyway to help take down Parallax, but apparently the film makers are more interested in showing that now that Hal admits he’s afraid of things he gets to be the Greatest Hero Ever. When Sinestro (Mark Strong), Kilowog (voiced by Michael Clarke Duncan), and Tomar Re show up it’s just to stop Hal from falling into the sun, not to actually help defeat Parallax. Kilowog crows about how he knows how to train Lanterns and Sinestro tosses some compliments Hal’s way at a meeting of all Lanterns (as I said, the Lanterns don’t police, they soldier with Oa as their base), but it all rings false since none of them were there to help. It’s like the cool kids in high school making a show of liking the uncool kid because they find out the uncool kid has a car and free access to booze.

The only time all film when I became emotionally invested was in the epilogue when Sinestro tries on the yellow power ring. As his costume turned yellow and the best villain in the DC Universe was born, that gave me chills, but only because of the fanboy in me. The film doesn’t make Sinestro a compelling character; it just makes him look like a small-headed weirdo.

On the whole, GREEN LANTERN is a truly frustrating movie. Neither good nor horrible, with some parts that work and others that don’t, with bad CGI, a truly horrific score by the usually solid James Newton Howard, LANTERN never gets up and running. It’s the kind of film that’s always searching for what it wants to be, and while Reynolds is game for all of it, he never embodies an actual person.