IRON MAN 3: Subtlety’s Kinda Had Its Day

Iron Man 3

Hi all, I’m not writing as many reviews these days due to time constraints, but I will try to write reviews for most of the movies I watch this summer. If you’re new here be very aware: SPOILERS ARE COMING. SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS. I do not hold anything back in my reviews. I talk about whatever I want, so if you haven’t seen Iron Man 3 and you don’t want to know anything about it, don’t read any further. If you’re simply unable to make decisions and are looking to a stranger on the internet for advice on whether you should see this movie or not, the answer is, Yes. One last time, spoilers lie beyond this point.

Iron Man 3 (2013) – The 7th Marvel Cinematic Universe Film – Directed Shane Black – Starring Robert Downey Jr., Don Cheadle, Gwyneth Paltrow, Ben Kingsley, Guy Pearce, Ty Simpkins, Rebecca Hall, Jon Favreau, Stephanie Szostak, James Badge Dale, Paul Bettany, William Sadler, Miguel Ferrer, Ashley Hamilton, and Stan Lee.

“Ever since that big guy with the hammer fell out of the sky, subtlety’s kinda had its day.” – Aldrich Killian to Tony Stark

In Phase One of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Marvel needed to win mainstream audiences over to characters they were likely only partly familiar with, and the payoff for this was THE AVENGERS, the third highest grossing movie of all time.

Creating a superhero cinematic universe on this level had never been attempted, and Marvel cleverly built one film on top of the other, using Nick Fury, Phil Coulson, and Tony Stark to connect the films. Anticipation for the post credits scene became an actual thing; it became a sign of membership in the Church of Marvel. Theaters emptied out but a few remained to get the thrill of evidence of the connection. Comic fans had spent forever waiting for the films to acknowledge that they weren’t just watching Spider-Man in New York, but Spider-Man in Marvel’s New York. The nature of film rights made this difficult for Marvel, of course, and DC and Warner Brothers had only a halfhearted interest in doing anything except printing Batman money. They tried and failed with Superman Returns, Bryan Singer’s $200 million love song to Christopher Reeve and Richard Donner, and then tried and failed with Green Lantern, Martin Campbell’s $200 million gamble on the precociousness of Ryan Reynolds.

Both films were stuck in the past. Superman Returns was clearly designed as a nostalgia fest, but Lantern was the more disheartening film, and not just because Martin Campbell had previously directed Casino Royale, the best action movie since Die Hard. It’s not awful, but it’s empty and cobbled together. Both films commit one of the largest sins of cinema in the 2000s – they had no souls of their own. They lacked vision: Singer borrowed his from Donner and Campbell got his from … marketing execs? Focus groups?

Forget quality for the moment – the truth of it all, the actual, honest-to-goodness, real difference between Marvel and DC at the moment isn’t that Marvel knows what it’s doing and DC doesn’t, but that Marvel and Disney want to make superhero movies and DC and Warner Brothers doesn’t.

Be real – if DC/WB had wanted a Wonder Woman movie to get made, it would have gotten made. There were rumors, there were people hired to write scripts, but … nothing. Remember when Vin Diesel was going to play the Flash? When David Goyer was going to do a Green Arrow prison movie? When Halle Berry was going to play Catwoman?

What happened to these movies? (Go with me on that last one.)

Chris Nolan’s Batman movies are excellent and it seems that DC/WB thought that was enough. (Watchmen is a DC movie but it’s not about the DC Universe.) The first and third movie in the Dark Knight trilogy aren’t so much Batman movies, anyway, but Bruce Wayne movies. As good as the films are, there’s a hint of “putting on a costume really is a silly thing to do.” Across town, Marvel has no access to Spider-Man or the X-Men, but they’re pushing on, getting a loan from Merrill Lynch to take control of the movies that get made with their characters. DC is commissioning scripts from everyone but barely committing to anything, and Marvel is tossing Iron Man and Hulk and Thor and Captain America onto the screen in solo movies and people are going to see them.

Seriously. All of a sudden, people not only know who Iron Man is, he’s the coolest superhero on the block. Jon Favreau and Robert Downey Jr. created the blueprint for the Marvel Cinematic Universe and everything built to the phenomenon that was THE AVENGERS.

So … where does one go from there? Does one regress to the past or push on to new stories?

Sequels have tended to operate on the bigger is better model: more villains, more action, more of everything. I was very curious about how IRON MAN 3 would work – was it going to be a sequel to IRON MAN 2 or AVENGERS? Were we going to get a video call to Steve Rogers? Lunch with Thor? A double date with Bruce and Betty? Was there going to be a nice easter egg on a screen somewhere about Thanos? When you’ve gone and made the third highest grossing movie of all time by filling the sandbox with all of your toys, how do you take the next step? How do you outdo what you’ve already done?

Short answer: you don’t even try.

IRON MAN 3 beautifully blends both the IRON MAN films and AVENGERS. There’s no Cap, no Thor, no Fury, no Coulson … only Banner (Mark Ruffalo) shows up for this go-round and they save him for the post-credits scene. Marvel clearly set out to make a film which refocused on the individual characters. Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) is haunted from his experiences in AVENGERS which has made it hard to go back to his old life. Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) is running Stark Industries now and she’s committed to Tony’s “no weapons” decree. When Aldrich Killian (Guy Pearce) shows up, having lost his old Igor appearance for a GQ look and pitching a new, admittedly impressive piece of tech, Pepper turns him down because it’s a tech that’s too easily weaponized.

There’s a nice mix of personal growth between Stark Industries’ three main actors: Pepper has never been better, Tony has never been worse, and Happy has never been better and worse at the same time. The expanded roles for Pepper and Happy (Jon Favreau) at the start of the film feel right. Deep in the film, when Tony has been captured by Killian, the antagonist tells the protagonist, “Ever since that big guy with the hammer fell out of the sky, subtlety’s kinda had its day,” but amidst all of the explosions and Iron Man suits, IRON MAN 3′s central argument is that subtlety has definitely not had it’s day.

Shane Black’s film will not be as influential as Favreau’s first IRON MAN, but there are some very nice, very subtle examples here that other films in Phase 2 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe would do well to emulate, and the key to that is seen in how Tony, Pepper, and Happy are used. Black deftly balances the decline of the first with the rise of the latter two. In this film, Pepper still loves Tony but she doesn’t need Tony. She’s more important to the company than he is, and while he’s still giving her large stuffed animals for Christmas, tinkering with new suits of armor, and reliving New York, she’s running a company.

In the previous MCU movies, Tony Stark goes to his lab because that’s where he wants to be, but now he’s in the lab as an escape. He’s hyper aware of his public image, of course, so he’s not Howard Hughesing it, but he’s definitely a man in crisis, a man exhibiting post traumatic stress disorder over the Chitauri attack. It’s important that Killian references Thor in his “subtlety’s kinda had it’s day” speech and not the Hulk because it’s Thor and the Chitauri that Tony focuses on as the reason for his problems. He understands science, but gods and aliens don’t fit into that model. Be clear, though, that Thor and the Chitauri are what he focuses on, but his problems go deeper.

When Happy’s expanded role gets him put into a coma by agents of the Mandarin (Ben Kingsley), Stark tells the press that he’s going to go after the terrorist. “This isn’t about nations,” he insists. “It’s personal.” It’s a powerful moment but it’s not exactly Henry V’s St. Crispin’s Day speech. Tony’s words feel empty and he looks tired. He’s lashing out, desperately searching for a new project to focus on. In a great scene between Tony and James Rhodes (Don Cheadle) at a restaurant, Tony practically begs to be let in on the Mandarin issue but Rhodey shuts him down. Contrast that to earlier films where Tony actively resisted working for the government. Now, it’s he who wants them and not the other way around. This exchange is a small part of a longer talk that ends with Tony suffering an anxiety attack when two kids ask for his autograph and present him with a crayon drawing of Iron Man. Tony writes the girl’s name on the drawing but then writes, “Help me” after it as his attack hits.

Subtlety has had it’s day? Not quite. Stark, and the film itself, forwards all the explosions and drama and snark, but look past that and here’s a guy who doesn’t have it figured out anymore. Who’s scared. Who’s unsure of his place in the world. It used to be fun when he was down in that lab, making fun of Dummy and trading barbs with Jarvis (Paul Bettany) and having his new invention not quite work out, but here it’s a bit sad, almost desperate. The billionaire playboy genius philanthropist has stopped being a visionary. Instead, he’s looking for comfort. Instead of building something new, he’s endlessly tinkering with his last invention. Pepper thinks he’s on Iron Man suit Mark 15, when Tony’s actually on Mark 42. The visionary is circling. When Tony looks at his armor now, it’s like he knows he’s created his masterpiece and all that’s left is to refine it instead of leaving the refinement for others and moving on to the next Big Idea.

In most of these sequels, when a character does the same thing he always does, it plays as tired because we’ve been there and seen it, but the subtle smarts of IRON MAN 3 is that it knows you want to see this scene even if it knows you’ll probably end up feeling that it’s just an echo of better scenes from days gone by, so it gives you the scene and makes it a purposeful echo and uses it to not celebrate Tony Stark, but to show how he’s as much stuck in the past as the audience. We’re watching IRON MAN and AVENGERS over and over again on Blu-ray and he’s watching them over and over again inside his mind. We’re all stuck together on the shelf.

So what do you do? Where do you go when you haven’t gone anywhere?

Critically, it’s only after his desperate plea to the Mandarin to come get him results in the Mandarin’s goons coming and getting him, blowing up his California mansion, that Tony gets moving forward again. Tony falls into the ocean and the armor gets him out of it and while Pepper ends up driving away with Maya Hansen (Rebecca Hall), a scientist/ex-one night stand of Tony’s, Jarvis delivers Tony to Tennessee. He crashes in the snow and his armor shuts down and he has to drag the heavy suit someplace warm. He breaks into a garage and gets to work, and it’s here, in this small garage, where Tony’s life gets going again. His work is interrupted by Harley (Ty Simpkins), a kid sidekick who manages to make the film better instead of worse by challenging Tony. The two of them cut deals and help each other and give each other crap. I like that Tony actually seems most comfortable in this film with someone who he doesn’t know. Part of being a visionary, one imagines, is a restless spirit. Tony has always treated life like it’s his playground, but over the last six MCU movies, he’s increasingly had to play the grown up.

What has that brought him? He already had fame and fortune, but it gave his life a purpose, it delivered him his One True Love, it put him in position to save the entire freaking world. It’s taken away his restlessness and replaced it with stagnation.

But thanks to the Mandarin, all of that is taken away from him and he has to build himself up again, and from that moment on, you get the sense that as awful as the things are that are going on, Tony’s actually happier now that he has a new problem to solve.

And about that problem …

The Marvel Cinematic Universe has largely stayed true to the comics. Oh, the details have been altered a whole bunch but there has yet to be a really large disconnect between the films and the comics.

Which brings us to the Mandarin.

In IRON MAN 3, Iron Man’s most classic foe has been turned into a fraud. The Mandarin is presented as a terrorist mastermind, blowing people up and teaching the United States lessons in the process. Kingsley’s approach to the character is to speak in long, slow, monologues punctuated by threats and promises of additional violence. He’s got Aldrich Killian’s Advanced Idea Mechanics (AIM) think tank helping him broadcast his message of hate out to the world.

Except he’s a phony. Without the benefit of his armor, Stark plays James Bond, breaking into the Mandarin’s mansion in Miami and discovering that the Mandarin is just an out of work British actor-slash-junkie holed up doing drugs, drinking beer, and fornicating with some whores. It’s bound to be controversial, of course, as Marvel has sacrificed one of its greatest villains on the altar of comedic distraction.

For me, though, I thought it worked beautifully. Maybe IRON MAN 3 didn’t need to do something to send shockwaves through fandom the way Nick Fury showing up in a post credits scene, but what this says to me is that Marvel has made a conscious decision to remind its fans that they’re not making films simply to translate the comics into celluloid. Phase One was about establishing the heroes and building up to AVENGERS. Phase 2 apparently isn’t interested in playing things safe. Marvel doesn’t want to sit on the shelf. It wants to push forward. The risk is that it comes across as disrespectful, but the number of people who are going to be so upset by this and not come back for future MCU movies is bound to be negligible.

And here’s the thing – this might ultimately make the Mandarin and even badder-ass villain than how he appears in the first half of IM3. There’s a couple things to keep in mind here. One, this could all be a ruse. Trevor Slattery (the name of the actor playing the Mandarin) might be nothing more than a backdoor escape the Mandarin created in case he needed him. One of his ten rings of power, after all, allows him to increase his psionic energy. The film presents Aldrich as the mastermind but there’s no reason Marvel couldn’t reveal in the next movie that the Mandarin used one of his rings to make Aldrich think he’s the mastermind.

Two, Aldrich claims at one point that he’s the Mandarin since he created the terrorist to help manipulate the global war on terror. There’s no reason Pearce couldn’t come back as the Mandarin in the next movie, either. Those dragon tattoos on his body could be more than just ornamental.

Three, Slattery claims that he’s completely unaware of any of the violence being perpetuated in the Mandarin’s name. He thinks he’s just playing a role, but even with all the drugs and booze and whores, that seems an illogical stretch of the truth. Does he really not think he’s talking to the President? Was his assassination on live television of a Roxxon Oil Exec all an act? Is he completely unaware that there’s no violence being committed out there? In the film, Stark and Rhodey need information from him that he’s willing to provide, so they overlook any inconsistencies in his story in exchange for stopping Killian.

Black forgoes a personal confrontation between Stark and the Mandarin for his climax, instead orchestrating a CGI orgy of multiple Iron Man suits versus Extremis soldiers. It’s effective without being excellent.

IRON MAN 3 is a very good movie. There’s no way it was going to top AVENGERS but as the duty first fell to Robert Downey Jr. to launch the MCU, it falls to him again to relaunch it. He is, once again, very good: funny, smart, fast-talking but now with self doubt added to the mix. I hate seeing him blow up all of his suits of armor, but I love that he goes back to his destroyed mansion to rescue Dummy from the wreckage without the film milking it for cheap emotion.

Subtlety’s day isn’t over, yet.

__________

Atomic Reactions: Marvel Comics on Film now available.

Atomic Reactions: Marvel Comics on Film now available.

When he’s not talking to other writers, Mark Bousquet is doing some writing himself. He is the author of multiple novels and collections, including the recently released The Haunting of Kraken MoorGunfighter GothicStuffed Animals for HireDreamer’s SyndromeHarpsichord and the Wormhole Witches, and Adventures of the Five. He has also published a review collection entitled Marvel Comics on Film, which covers every cinematic and TV movie based on a superhero from the House of Ideas. A complete listing of all his work can be found at his Amazon author page.

ATOMIC REACTIONS: MARVEL COMICS ON FILM Now Available on Kindle!

The Kindleversion of ATOMIC REACTIONS: MARVEL COMICS ON FILM is now available for purchase at Amazon. I’m really pleased with how it’s turned out.

Here’s the KINDLE link and here’s the PAPERBACK link.

Taken from my reviews here, MARVEL COMICS ON FILM contains every single one of my Marvel reviews, and covers every single instance of Marvel Comics on film that I’m aware of.

Here’s the book’s Table of Contents:

Table of Contents

Fade from Black

Part One: The Marvel Cinematic Universe
1. Iron Man (2008)
2. The Incredible Hulk (2008)
3. Iron Man 2 (2010)
4. Thor (2011)
5. Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)
6. Marvel’s The Avengers (2012)

The Avengers Reactions
1. The Hawkeye Reaction
2. The Agent Coulson Reaction
3. The Black Widow Reaction
4. The Nick Fury Reaction
5. The Maria Hill Reaction
6. The Captain America Reaction
7. The Chitauri/Thanos Reaction
8. The Hulk Reaction
9. The Thor Reaction
10. The Loki Reaction
11. The Iron Man Reaction

Marvel One-Shots
1. The Consultant, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor’s Hammer, and Item 47

Part Two: Spider-Man
The Sam Raimi Trilogy
1. Spider-Man (2002)
2. Spider-Man 2 (2004)
3. Spider-Man 3 (2007)

The Marc Webb Relaunch
4. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

Part Three: The X-Men
1. X-Men (2000)
2. X2: X-Men United (2003)
3. X-Men: The Last Stand (2006)
4. X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)
5. X-Men: First Class (2011)

Part Four: Blade
1. Blade (1998)
2. Blade II (2002)
3. Blade: Trinity (2004)

Part Five: The Punisher
1. The Punisher (1989)
2. The Punisher (2004)
3. Punisher: War Zone (2008)

Part Six: The Fantastic Four
1. Fantastic Four (1994)
2. Fantastic Four (2005)
3. Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007)

Part Seven: Ghost Rider
1. Ghost Rider (2007)
2. Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (2012)

Part Eight: Daredevil & Elektra
1. Daredevil (2003)
2. Elektra (2005)

Part Nine: The Non-MCU Avengers
1. Captain America (1944 serial)
2. Captain America (1990)
3. Hulk (2003)

Part Ten: The Nexus of All Realities
1. Howard the Duck (1986)
2. Man-Thing (2005)

Part Eleven: The TV Movies
1. Captain America (1979)
2. Captain America II: Death Too Soon (1979)
3. Dr. Strange (1978)
4. Generation X (1996)
5. The Incredible Hulk (1977 pilot)
6. The Incredible Hulk Returns (1988)
7. The Trial of the Incredible Hulk (1989)
8. The Death of the Incredible Hulk (1990)
9. Nick Fury: Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. (1998)
10. Power Pack (1991)
11. Spider-Man (1977 pilot)

Part Twelve: The Marvel Animated Movies
1. The Invincible Iron Man (2007)
2. Doctor Strange: The Sorcerer Supreme (2007)
3. Hulk Vs. (2009)
4. Next Avengers: Heroes of Tomorrow (2008)
5. Planet Hulk (2010)
6. Thor: Tales of Asgard (2011)
7. Ultimate Avengers (2006)
8. Ultimate Avengers 2 (2006)

THE INVINCIBLE IRON MAN: Can You Get Me In the Building?

The Invincible Iron Man (2007) – Directed by Patrick Archibald, Jay Oliva, Frank D. Paur – Starring Marc Worden, Rodney Saulsberry, Fred Tatasciore, and Gwendoline Yeo.

I’m not really sure what to make of THE INVINCIBLE IRON MAN.

Taken as is, it’s not a bad little animated movie. There’s too much Tony Stark (Marc Worden) and not enough Iron Man, there’s too much trying to prevent the Mandarin and not enough actual Mandarin, and we’re dreadfully back in origin mode at the start of the film, so it is, by no means, a perfect animated film, but it’s not a bad watch on the Netflix Instant.

My real question about INVINCIBLE is whether it has any merit in a post-Robert Downey, Jr. world. In the pre-IRON MAN world, of course, INVINCIBLE didn’t have to live up to anything but other animated versions of the Armored Avenger. In that light, INVINCIBLE is pretty good, if a bit depressing. There’s some elements of the film that foreshadow the Favreau motion picture (Tony getting blown up in a convoy, being saved by an enemy), but there are some contradictory elements, too (Howard Stark still being alive being the most significant).

The live-action films don’t have to cater to the animated films, of course, because their appeal and influence is so much greater, and it’s perhaps a bit unfair (though unavoidable) that the animated films live the shadow of the live-action movies, especially when the animated movies come out first. In a sense, if the animated film does come out first,* it’s real purpose is as a superheroic amuse-bouche, a bite-sized snack to whet the appetite for the meal that follows. Taken on its own, the amuse-bouche works, but if you leave the restaurant talking about it instead of the main course, then there’s something seriously wrong with that restaurant.

*This doesn’t really apply to characters like Batman, Superman, and Spider-Man, who seemingly always simultaneously exist in both animated and live-action form, but for secondary characters.

At the time it was released, it was nice to see an Iron Man film, but now … INVINCIBLE is a good watch, but unless they are something extraordinary, I think these Marvel animated films work best when they are doormen that open the door to the larger Marvel Universe. It should grab fans flipping the dial or picking through the bargain bin and help lead them to the larger world of Marvel entertainment, but INVINCIBLE doesn’t really do that. Much like Doctor Strange: The Sorcerer Supreme, INVINCIBLE is oddly somber. I admire the attempt to tell a serious story here but the filmmakers should be able to do that at the same time they give us something a bit more enjoyable to watch.

Maybe it would have been better for all of these animated Lionsgate features followed the Ultimate Avengers and were tied to the Ultimate universe, because then they would have continued value as part of a larger collective.

As it stands, however, INVINCIBLE is little more than a diversion. I own it on DVD but I haven’t had any interest in upgrading to a Blu-ray even though it’s got a permanent place in the bargain bin.

And I really like spending money.

INVINCIBLE starts out with a pre-Iron Man Tony Stark. He’s still the genius visionary who likes to do two things: invent stuff and have sex with hot women. It’s not a bad life, one supposes, but the story arc that develops here from Tony Stark the Playboy Industrialist to Tony Stark the Concerned Super Hero is a bit tame. There’s a moment here where the feds are after Stark, wanting him arrested for selling guns to terrorists (which he didn’t do), and he’s literally hanging out across the street from Stark Tower, unshaven, and calling for help to get back into the building. He actually asks for help twice – once from Pepper and once from his dad – and it’s really pathetic to see that this Tony Stark can’t even figure out a way to get back into his lab without help.

As mentioned, the terrorist group Jade Dragons is stealing Stark weaponry in order to keep the Mandarin from returning. It’s a nice twist, that the bad guys here are really trying to prevent a bigger bad guy from reappearing. Stark’s pal Rhodey gets captured by the Dragons, which leads to Stark getting himself blown up, which leads to Rhodey and a shaman saving Stark. The only nice person in the terrorist group is Li Mei and she also happens to be the only attractive young woman in the group, so, you know, it’s like we’re living out a Stark-engineered fantasy at Rekall.

Tony builds the original grey Iron Man suit, and upon seeing it, Mei believes Tony to be the prophesied Iron Knight who will battle the Mandarin to the death. There’s some nice elemental villains, but like the baddies in Doctor Strange, they’re really just cool visuals without any real attachment to Iron Man. It’s not personal and they’re not interesting on a narrative level. They’re just cool to look at.

There’s nothing wrong with that, of course, but if the filmmakers had managed to give us cool visuals alongside a better connection, INVINCIBLE could have been something special instead of something merely pretty good.

Instead, we’re left with a whole lot of sitting through Stark and the Feds and the hunt for the rings (which almost feels like the subplot, at times, when it seems like it really should be the dominate plot in an animated film) until we get to Li Mei’s revelation that she’s actually trying to bring the Mandarin back instead of thwarting his return. Then there’s fighting and personal struggles and Tony convinces Li to turn her back on the Mandarin and it all just sort of ends with a whimper instead of some marvelous Marvel mayhem.

It’s all just sort of okay, in the end. INVINCIBLE IRON MAN is certainly worth a watch, and even a re-watch or two if you’re jonesing for a Mandarin story or some technology vs. magic action (which is animated nicely), but you’d best do it before IRON MAN 3 hits theaters in May 2013.

Because when it does, we’ll finally have a live-action Mandarin, and another of INVINCIBLE’s selling points will grow dimmer.