THE DARK KNIGHT RISES: The Rules Aren’t Weapons Anymore, They’re Shackles

The Dark Knight Rises (2012) – Directed by Christopher Nolan – Starring Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Gary Oldman, Anne Hathaway, Tom Hardy, Marion Cotillard, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Morgan Freeman, Matthew Modine, Cillian Murphy, Nestor Carbonell, William Devane, Brett Cullen, Thomas Lennon, and Liam Neeson.

If you’re new to the Anxiety and only stopping by because a search engine brought you here, welcome. Be aware that SPOILERS follow. Lots and lots of SPOILERS. Read ahead at your own risk.

The Dark Knight … Quits?

Over the course of Christopher Nolan’s outstanding DARK KNIGHT trilogy, Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) has been obsessed with turning Batman into a symbol, into something that has meaning beyond a guy in a black suit who goes out into the night to punch people. He’s wanted Batman to inspire those who are good to make Gotham better by becoming active and those who who are bad to make Gotham better by becoming inactive. In between the ending of DARK KNIGHT and the start of RISES, we saw that this worked, though not the way Bruce would have foreseen. Batman and Commissioner Gordon (Gary Oldman) conspire to bury the evidence that Harvey Dent went all Two-Face in order to lay the blame at Batman’s feet. In the wake of Batman becoming Public Enemy No. 1, sweeping crime legislation was passed the the organized crime element of Gotham has been largely erased.

Meaning that Gotham has become, as close as is possible for a major city, a safe place to live.

Then Bane (Tom Hardy) shows up, causes all sorts of trouble (we’ll get to it), Batman comes back to active duty after eight years off because a gorgeous woman steals his mom’s pearls and a young cop shows up at his doorstep and calls him a (meow) quitter (meow), said gorgeous woman betrays him, Bane breaks his back, Bruce gets dumped overseas, Bruce rises, big final battle in which Bats appears to blow himself up in order to save the city and …

He retires to Italy with gorgeous woman, starting a new life under a new identity, and nods to Alfred in an outdoor cafe.

What’s heroic about that ending? Bruce Wayne, who wants to inspire Gotham to become something better, decides to run away with Selina Kyle (Anne Hathaway) because, screw it, his body is wearing down, he’s broke, and if they need anything, it’s not like Selina just can’t steal it for them.

I’m sure Bruce has a great life in Italy painting houses for the rest of his life or something, but it’s a completely dumb ending because the message it sends is that being a hero is not unlike being a professional athlete – you give the best athletic years of your life to your profession, and then when it wears down, you fade away into the sunset.

What bothers me about the ending isn’t that Bruce can’t physically play dress up anymore. When we first see Bruce around Wayne Manor (he hosts public events but will not attend them, preferring to stay hidden inside his big house), he’s limping around on a cane and looking the worse for wear. I completely thought he was faking, and that at some point he’d toss the cane aside and stop pretending to be Bruce and reclaim the Bat mantle. When he tells Alfred (Michael Caine) to schedule a medical appointment for him at whatever hospital the injured Jim Gordon is in, I just thought it was a convenient way for him to get close. Not so. The doctor (Thomas Lennon) lays out all sorts of injuries: the absence of cartilage in his knees, serious brain trauma, and on and on, revealing that Bruce isn’t playing injured, but really has given much of his body over to his bat-related pursuits. That Nolan has gone this way is to his credit; superhero films typically focus on the emotional injuries while any physical injuries are largely cosmetic, but here Nolan pulls back the curtain to show us that all of those shots of bruises and scratches and puncture wounds he’s show us over the course of the trilogy aren’t just to show off Bale’s physique – there’s a real, debilitating consequence to them that adds up over time.

Of course, when it’s time to fight, Bruce doesn’t walk around complaining about his sore back, doesn’t limp around like a pro wrestler selling a injured knee, and doesn’t forget people’s names or how to use things that one might expect from someone who’s suffered that much brain trauma, but it does allow us to see these fight scenes as something other than cinematic ballet. The fight scenes in RISES are brutal. Nolan doesn’t offer up any visual BAM! and POW! but they’re in the movie with every punch and kick thrown.

So Bruce is really injured. Good. He probably can’t continue to be Batman. Cool. But the idea that Bruce runs away to live a life beyond Batman is kinda bogus. There’s no heroism to running away with Selina Kyle and turning your back on a city that needs to be nearly completely rebuilt. Batman saves the day and inspires the city to, at the very least, rise up to meet Bane’s challenge, but then his job is done? Gotham is about to face it’s single biggest challenge in rebuilding itself and Bruce wants to run away?

Bruce is certainly entitled to getting some rest and relaxation after everything he’s been through, but I find it incredibly disappointing that he fails to embrace the words Alfred spoke earlier in the film. The two men have some harsh words when Bruce decides to become Batman again, which results in Alfred quitting. Alfred’s point, however, was that Bruce didn’t need to become Batman to inspire the city. He’s sitting on all this incredible forensic technology that would benefit the police, but he refuses to give it to them because they’re not ready for it and might misuse it. He’s sitting on a new form of fusion energy reactor, but he refuses to let it out to the public because … wait for it … they’re not ready for it and someone might turn it into a weapon. Alfred tells Bruce that he can apply himself to the city in other ways and do just as much good, but Bruce is locked on the idea of being a symbol.

At the end of the film, after Bruce has faked his death, and all of his assets are being sold off to pay for debts, and Wayne Manor has been turned over to the city to be a new home for orphaned children, and Detective John Blake (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) has been given the Batcave, and Alfred has been given whatever was left, and someone has fixed the Bat signal, Bruce and Selina have relocated to Italy, leaving behind that demolished city. I’m glad that he’s happy but he’s missed Alfred’s fundamental point – that he can help his city in ways other than being Batman. One of the plot points in the film has Bruce lose nearly entire fortune due to a board member’s illegal trading on Bruce’s account (his plan was to bankrupt Bruce and buy Wayne Enterprises on the cheap), but Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman) says it’s possibly to eventually prove it and recover the funds, but Bruce can’t be bothered to do this. He just wants out, and I get it, but he’s not doing what’s best for his city. At the end, he’s doing what’s best for him.

Was that really the point of all this?

Even if he couldn’t get all of that money back, he’s still got his brain, which is as valuable as the money or equipment or symbolism, and it would allow him to have a life beyond Batman and inside his city. Bruce had such a man-crush on Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart) in DARK KNIGHT that it would make sense for him to follow in Harvey’s footsteps and become the “White Knight” of Gotham, being a philanthropist instead of a lawyer, but giving his money, his time, and his brain to improving the city.

Instead, he tosses them a few gifts and leaves it up to Blake to become Gotham’s new vigilante.

That final argument between Alfred and Bruce rings a bit false, or repetitive, or just silly because what does it prove? That Alfred really will leave? Well, he does, and at first I was really disappointed by it. I wondered when Alfred would re-establish himself in the narrative, but he doesn’t until the epilogue. Nolan has assembled an exceptional cast of actors for his DARK KNIGHT films, but Caine has been at the top of that chart and it’s a curious decision to bench your best player halfway through the film, let alone that it didn’t make much narrative sense for Alfred to bail when times were toughest.

As the film rolled on, however, it becomes clear why Nolan jettisoned Alfred – there was nothing for him to do. Bane ends up cutting Gotham off from the rest of the world and setting up a chaos-filled, down-with-rich modern day revolution, and there’s really nothing Alfred could be doing. I mean, sure, he could hang out in the Batcave and, you know, do all those things he does when Bruce is around. Or he could, you know, be out helping people. Or maybe even fighting, since we know from the last film he was in the military, but that view of Alfred doesn’t fit into Nolan’s world because even though Gotham is going through this massive crisis, no one really does anything they weren’t normally doing. Gordon and Blake are still cops gathering intel and trying to solve the mystery of where the bomb is being kept, Lucius is still the quiet man in charge of the board members holed up and working on science solutions, and Bruce is off building himself back up. There seems to be nothing for Alfred to do in Nolan’s damaged Gotham; he has become a relic and unable to contribute to the narrative.

I made passing mention in my DARK KNIGHT review that Nolan is something of an illusionist and that’s in evidence here to a much greater degree. If you go to a movie for a tight, sensible narrative, you might not enjoy RISES all that much. Nolan’s general storytelling technique is to sketch out a Big Idea but then focus on the arcs of the individual characters talking about that Big Idea. That’s what he’s interested in … characters and ideas, not waterproof narrative coherency. What’s amazing is that he’s such an incredible talent and creates such interesting stories that a good number of people (myself included) are happy to sit in a theater and absorb the show, making a choice to ignore any of the red flags that pop up.

In RISES, for instance, Bane turns Gotham into revolutionary France rather easily. Why? Because the story needs him to do this in order to create a big, fitting end to the trilogy. It doesn’t really make sense that Gotham would so easily turn against each other at the urging of a muscle-bound terrorist with a mask, but here they are, going rabid as soon as Bane tells them to take back their city. Bane is in possession of a retirement speech that Gordon had written where he comes clean about Harvey/Two-Face and exonerating Batman, and he reads the letter and everyone instantly believes him. If anyone questions the veracity of the letters, we don’t see it.

The admission letter itself, is problematic. After all this time, Gordon is going to out his and Batman’s cover-up? Why? Guilt? Go to church. Wisely, Gordon never actually delivers the note, which suggests that writing it down serves as a form of confessional for him, but he must have entertained the idea to deliver the letter because he brought it with him. Maybe this is Gordon’s guilt shining through, or maybe he’s punishing himself for his wife leaving with their children (apparently unable to see him propping up the man who was going to kill his son), or maybe he’s tired of seeing Batman’s name dragged through the mud. Whatever the case, the decision to write the letter now does signal that Gordon misses the old days a bit. He has to realize that revealing all of this information will effectively serve as a jailbreak, letting out countless criminals who were prosecuted by Dent, but there he goes, jotting it down on paper. What’s worse, is that this letter also serves as Gordon’s retirement announcement, as if everyone’s going to go, “Sure thing, Jim, have a nice rest of your life,” instead of arresting him and tossing him in jail for all the crimes he and Batman committed.

Because let’s be clear – Batman is, by the letter of the law – a criminal. He’s not guilty of all the Dent crimes he took “credit” for, but he’s guilty of all sorts of crimes. I’m not sure I buy Deputy Commissioner Peter Foley’s (Matthew Modine) decision to go after Batman instead of Bane, but Foley is a political animal looking to make the collar Gordon never could.

Then there’s Bane’s weakness – his mask. When Bruce has been dumped into the prison where Bane was raised, there’s still prisoners there who remember him and tell Bruce his story. All that’s fine, but then they tell Bruce that Bane is in constant pain that’s only kept in check … by his mask. Meaning that the key to Bruce having a chance to take him down is to … punch him in the face.

I know Cinematic Bats doesn’t have the experience that Comic Book Bats has, but if I was fighting a big, scary dude with a mask on his face, I think I might, I don’t know, hit it, at some point, if only to shut up his modulated voice. I certainly wouldn’t need some dude half a world away to tell me that this was the key to defeating Bane.

The prisoners’ relationship to Bruce is rather inconsistent. They know Bane has dumped him there, and one of them has even been assigned to watch over him, in order that he can watch TV to get updates from Gotham. (I’m not even going to get into how Bruce can get Gotham Cable News in a hole in the ground on the other side of the planet and everyone is totally okay with this.) The only way to get out of this prison is to climb up through the hole that just so happens to look like the well he fell through when he was a kid. They cheer Bruce when he makes the attempt (cheering “Rise” in their native language) but while the medical man tells Bruce about Bane’s weakness, he also lets Bruce believe that Bane was the one and only person to ever climb out of the prison, when in fact it was Talia al Ghul (Marion Cotillard).

And why does Bane allow all of Gotham’s cops to remain underground? Because he wants them to suffer? Or because the story needs them to stick around so Gordon has some ground troops to deploy against Bane’s troops in the final battle.

Illusionists (like the League of Shadows, the group formerly led by Ra’s al Ghul and now led by Bane) use misdirection, and Nolan does this, too, because while this clunky, contrived narrative is going on, Nolan does such a great job of creating heightened interpersonal drama that I’m largely willing to forgive faults in the story if they’re needed to hit the emotional notes.

Nolan gets another round of brilliant performances from his cast. Tom Hardy is really terrific as Bane, though after an entire movie of being super bad-ass, he’s dismissed by the Cat with one blast from the Bat-cycle. She gives Bats a funny line about how she’s not totally committed to his “no guns” policy (and don’t think Batman’s earlier declaration of that policy didn’t ring extra loud in the aftermath of the Aurora shootings), but it does open up questions the narrative doesn’t want to answer. When Bane reads Gordon’s letter on the TV, Gordon is at Blake’s apartment, and Blake comes down hard on Gordon for having dirty hands. Gordon insists that sometimes you reach a point that’s so far gone that “the rules aren’t weapons anymore … they’re shackles,” and that you need to work outside the law. He and Bats were willing to do this with Harvey Dent for the good of the city, but now Bruce won’t cross that line to take out a gun and pop Bane in the head? Why? Because the physical line is further than the philosophical line? He’s willing to put Gotham through all this pain instead of doing what Selina eventually has to do to defeat Bane?

I’m not a huge Anne Hathaway fan but she’s really good here, too, as is the usual standout performances from Bale, Caine, Freeman, and Oldman. With Selina, Bruce finally has a match. I didn’t think Hathaway had it in her to stand up to Bale’s intensity, but her performance displays a Selina Kyle that’s able to shape situations instead of dominating them. Gordon-Levitt and Modine are also good.

The best line in the movie is when Batman is about to take off with the bomb and sacrifice himself. Gordon admits that he never really cared who was underneath the mask, but since this is the end. Bats doesn’t tell him outright, but does tell him that a hero can be anyone, even someone who puts a coat around a young boy’s shoulders and tells him it’s going to be alright, which is how they first met on the night of the murder of Bruce’s parents.

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES is a fitting end to Nolan’s trilogy, and Nolan proves himself the first director, and Batman proves itself the first superhero franchise, that delivers three excellent movies. There’s no drop-off in quality here, at all, though from much of the critical reaction (both professional and personal), it does seem that tastes have changed a bit since THE DARK KNIGHT hit theaters four years ago. 2012 has been an excellent year for superheroes, though, as the three biggest cinematic franchises currently in operation (the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Spider-Man, and Batman) all released outstanding films this summer. Not only that, but Avengers, Amazing Spider-Man, and RISES are all very different movies, with Avengers offering the rousing thrill-ride, Amazing spinning a teen-angst web, and RISES asking the big questions.

The end of RISES infers that Blake will continue on the Bats tradition, but I can’t believe we’ll ever see that future. I don’t envy the director who gets control of Batman next, but what young filmmaker wouldn’t want that challenge? With Man of Steel hitting theaters next summer, and Marvel running full engines ahead with their slate of projects, I imagine we’ll see the Batman reboot in theaters no later than 2017, and probably closer to 2015. Christopher Nolan and his team have done superheroes proud, creating a self-contained universe that took from some of the best comic book story lines in Batman’s history.

As a fan of Batman, then, and even with all my minor quibbles, there’s only one thing I can really say to Nolan for creating these three films.

Thank you.

THE DARK KNIGHT: Some Men Just Want to Watch the World Burn

The Dark Knight (2008) – Directed by Christopher Nolan – Starring Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Heath Ledger, Gary Oldman, Aaron Eckhart, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Morgan Freeman, Eric Roberts, Michael Jai White, Tiny Lister, Chin Han, Nestor Carbonell, William Fichtner, and Cillian Murphy.

THE DARK KNIGHT is a big, complicated, extremely well made, grown up movie. This is not likely the first time you’ve heard that, and not only have I talked about THE DARK KNIGHT repeatedly over the past four years, everyone has repeatedly talked about this movie over the past four years. Here’s what we know: THE DARK KNIGHT is a brilliant movie with brilliant performances and brilliant directing. Chris Nolan does a fantastic job stuffing KNIGHT (and BATMAN BEGINS and maybe DARK KNIGHT RISES – I’ll know later today) full of ideas.

Here’s what I’m not going to do: I’m not going to walk you through the plot. Given the length of some of my reviews for new movies, I shudder to think how many words I would have churned out had I reviewed KNIGHT when it was released instead of after four years of the world obsessing over the film. To be honest, if I wasn’t planning on seeing DARK KNIGHT RISES tomorrow (actually, now, later today), I’d have watched Man-Thing over DARK KNIGHT. It’s not that Man-Thing is likely to be a better film, but it’s a film I haven’t seen and a film I haven’t spent any time talking about with people who have seen it.

So, in summation: DARK KNIGHT is brilliant and lots and lots and lots of people on the internet have written about it ad nauseum, so I’m going to focus on the three areas that strike me as most relevant.

I: PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

It’s hard not to watch the Nolan Batman films in the wake of the Aurora shootings, but DARK KNIGHT is all about the responsibility an individual bears for the actions of others. Bruce wanted to become a symbol in BATMAN BEGINS and here we see the unintended consequence of achieving that goal. Initially, we see the intended consequence, that some criminals are curbing their behavior because they fear his presence, but immediately after this we see the unintended consequence of becoming an inspiration, and that’s how others will try to walk in your shoes. There are men across Gotham who are dressing up as Batman and going out and fighting crime.

Bruce (Christian Bale) is not amused, arresting them alongside the Scarecrow’s (Cillian Murphy) crew. “What’s the difference between you and us?” one of the Pretend Batmen asks, to which Bats replies, “I don’t wear hockey pads.” For Bruce, of course, the problem is that he now sees another layer of Gothamites that need his protection – the wannabes. But it also stresses the Chaos vs. Order idea represented in the film with the Joker (Heath Ledger) vs. Batman. It’s nice that Bruce feels protective, but the individual still has to bear the responsibility for their own actions.

In the Nolan films, Bruce Wayne is always looking for the reasons why things happen; it’s as if he sees himself as the nexus of all bad things in the universe – either he’s looking for the reasons why the bad things have happened to him or he’s fretting over the bad things he’s caused. It’s a crippling emotional state to be in and the truth is, no matter that the message comes from the Joker or the Scarecrow, Bruce really is a guy who could use some therapy – whether that comes in the form of a professional or just a friend.

II: PERSONAL DESIRES VS. PUBLIC GOOD

I really don’t like superhero stories about superheroes who don’t want to be superheroes. There’s a bit of that in DARK KNIGHT when Bruce becomes immobilized by all of the Joker’s killings. The Joker decides he wants to see Bats unmasked and so he says, “If Batman doesn’t unmask himself, I’ll keep killing,” and Bruce says, “Well, I guess I have to shut everything down and turn myself in.”

Here’s a thought – be a detective and find the Joker.

Unfortunately, there’s just not a lot of detective work in Nolan’s films. Well, not a lot from Bruce, who’s always giving Alfred or Lucius the time-consuming tasks.

Bruce is willing to give up being the Batman because he thinks this will get him Rachel (Maggie Gyllenhaal), even though, as she points out, “They won’t let us be together once you do this.” But Bruce is still willing to do this until Dent steps up and tells the world that’s he’s actually the Batman. Dent is counting on Bats to take advantage of the situation to catch the Joker; Dent’s willingness to make himself the bait gets Bruce out of his funk. Bruce’s desperate attachment to Rachel is yet another sign that he’s still more little boy than man, but Rachel’s decision to ultimately choose Harvey over Bruce is a sign that she isn’t.

And Alfred’s decision to hide this information from Bruce after Rachel’s death shows that he knows Bruce is still a little boy, too.

III: SOME MEN JUST WANT TO WATCH THE WORLD BURN

This is Alfred’s big line about explaining the Joker to Bruce when he’s in his quest to make sense of things, but Alfred is wrong – at least when it comes to the Joker, because the Clown Prince is continually trying to make points. He’s not just interested in creating chaos, as he says at one point, but in making grand points: he wants to bring the Batman to his knees and he wants to drag Dent, the city’s “White Knight” down to his level. The Joker seems very interested in making the point that everyone can fall, to give in to their darker nature.

And that’s something you have to pay attention to in DARK KNIGHT because Nolan pulls this trick between dialogue and action. He has people make very dramatic statements that end up being false (such as with Alfred), lies (the Joker), or even meaningless (Bruce’s declarations about quitting).

There are also loads of unnecessary bits in DARK KNIGHT that could have been cut to produce a tighter narrative – such as the big action sequence in Hong Kong or the bits with Bruce getting ready to turn himself in. There are also unnecessary swerves: Bruce’s decision to out himself, which doesn’t happen and Jim Gordon’s (Gary Oldman) death, which turns out to have been faked.

THE DARK KNIGHT is a great film, but I do get the sense that some of this is due to Nolan’s complete confidence in the material he’s presenting. Nolan’s The Prestige is about creating illusions and that’s part of what Nolan does in DARK KNIGHT – by having a character’s words and actions, or their words and the film’s actions, work at cross purposes, Nolan makes his film’s more complicated than they initially appear.

At the end of the film, Bruce learns that if he truly wants to be the symbol that Gotham needs, he needs to take one for the team. Instead of having Harvey Dent take the fall for his crimes, Batman and Gordon conspire to have Batman take the fall. It’s a very Frank Miller-esque twist and it works for me because it works as the penance Bruce needs to pay for all of his sins.

And there’s a lot of them.

All told, however, while there’s lots of little problems with DARK KNIGHT, Nolan’s vision is powerful enough to see it through. There’s great performances throughout the film (especially Ledger) and it definitely keeps me hooked, but I am coming around to the idea that BATMAN BEGINS is actually a better overall film while DARK KNIGHT is a better overall illusion.

But it is a hell of an illusion.

BATMAN BEGINS: All Creatures Feel Fear

Batman Begins (2005) – Directed by Christopher Nolan – Starring Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, Katie Holmes, Gary Oldman, Cillian Murphy, Morgan Freeman, Tom Wilkinson, Rutger Hauer, Ken Watanabe, Mark Boone Junior, Linus Roache, and Rade Serbedzija.

There is this thing that happens with superhero movies where the second films in trilogies tend to overshadow the first film, even if the first film was pretty darn great on its own: Spider-Man 2 trumps Spider-Man, X2 trumps X-Men, Blade II trumps Blade, Iron Man 2 … well, okay, this Sequel Shadow Effect isn’t a guarantee or anything, but it does happen with the Nolan Dark Knight trilogy, as THE DARK KNIGHT has been widely (and justifiably) heralded as one of the greatest superhero movies, while BATMAN BEGINS has been largely relegated to the corner.

Heck, even the decision to refer to the Nolan films as The Dark Knight Trilogy is a subtle dig at BEGINS, and I’m guessing that somewhere in the Warner’s production or marketing offices they wish they had given the DARK KNIGHT title to BEGINS.

There is an upside to the second film in a trilogy becoming the dominant film, however. If the second film gets the bulk of attention (and spins in the Blu Ray player), re-watching the first film can be a really pleasant treat. I say this to encourage you to give BEGINS a new watch if it’s been awhile since you’ve seen it, because this is an exceptionally well made movie. I’m probably one of the few who’s watched BEGINS more than I’ve watched DARK KNIGHT, but don’t read into that comment that I’m about to make the case that BEGINS is a better movie than DARK KNIGHT. They’re both excellent, and parsing out which one is better is an interesting chat but not the kind of conversation I’m going to invest in too heavily.

The reason I’ve watched BEGINS more is largely a product of when it was released and what it represented, which was something completely new to superhero movies. I don’t mean to overstate the literariness of Nolan’s film, but rather to point out the largeness of the film and the look of the film. Most superhero movies feel very isolated because superhero movies (especially origin stories) tend to be focused on an individual’s journey and focus on a specific setting, but Nolan opens the Batman mythos up to the entire world. Philosophically, Nolan’s BEGINS is interested in not just the individual, but the symbolism of the hero.

It’s been said a million times by a million people that DC heroes represent who we strive to be while Marvel heroes represent who we are, and Nolan is the first director to really examine the DC end of that idea, though it’s less about the perfect ideals a hero represents and more about the ramifications of creating something grandiose, of creating something that will inspire other people. Nolan executes this idea brilliantly by making Bruce aware that he’s building something in Batman that will become a symbol that goes well beyond one person in a costume stopping bad guys.

You can reduce BEGINS down to its core concept very easily; it’s about a boy who grows up and tries to live up to his father’s standards by taking a different path. I love this angle because so few superhero movies are about a man attempting to live up to the legacy of his father. We haven’t yet reached that stage in superhero movies, yet, where legacy characters take over the mantle, but Bruce (Christian Bale) is clearly attempting to become as good a man as Thomas Wayne (Linus Roache) was in his day, before he was murdered by a mugger in an alley next to an opera house.

There are plenty of superhero movies which deal with fathers and sons (both blood or surrogate), but this is the first time where living up to this legacy plays such an important and critical role in the film. (By the main character – the other best example of this aspect of a legacy character is Harry Osborn in the Raimi Spider-Man films.) And it’s the best example of a character deciding that the way to make the same kind of impact as his father is to put on a costume and punch people. Bruce is still exceedingly wealthy and if he wanted to walk in his father’s footsteps and build lots of new building and projects for Gotham, he certainly could. If Bruce were willing to be more critical of his father, he might admit part of his motivation to become Batman is because his father’s economic approach failed.

In the film’s final act, the big action sequence takes place on the monorail that his father paid to have built. On the night Bruce’s parents are killed, they take the monorail into the heart of the city, and we see that the cars are brand new, bright, and shiny. Obviously, this represents the dream of a better Gotham, and the end of the film, when the monorail has become an unsafe means of transportation and when the cars have become dirty, represents the failed execution of that dream. That Batman and Ra’s al Ghul (Liam Neeson) have their final battle in the monorail is, of course, not a coincidence.

The argument between Bruce and Ra’s (or Ducard, as he identifies himself during the opening portion of the film when he’s hiding his identity) through the film comes down to nothing more than a differing philosophy in how to fix something that’s broken. Ra’s method is that one must destroy what is broken while Bruce holds out hope that Gotham isn’t beyond saving. In part, then, this philosophical difference is cause by a difference of opinion in where Gotham lies on the Scale of Broken – Ra’s thinks it’s beyond hope while Bruce doesn’t, but even if Bruce did think Gotham was lost, he would not be cool with killing hundreds, let alone thousands, let alone hundreds of thousands, of people in order to make something better.

Yet the film makes clear Bruce is not against destroying the city’s architecture in order to make Gotham better. He destroys the monorail because Ra’s is using it to unleash his toxin on Gotham, but symbolically (and BEGINS is all about symbols), Bruce’s decision to sacrifice one of his father’s great projects works as an indication that as much as Bruce loves his father, his father’s approach to fixing the city did not work. Bruce has such a hero worship for his dad that the move has to come symbolically. The same can be said for the destruction of Wayne Manor, which is caused by Ra’s League of Shadows. Bruce tells Rachel he’s going to rebuild the mansion to look exactly like it was, but Alfred (Michael Caine) suggests that Bruce could use this as an opportunity to fortify the corner of Wayne Manor that houses the Batcave. By keeping the visible mansion obsessively the same, Bruce seeks to rebuild the public face of the Wayne family (which is still his father’s face), but by expanding the Batcave, Bruce is also admitting that his father’s way did not work.

There’s two parts of the Batcave expansion that strike home with me. The first and most important aspect is that it’s Alfred who raises the idea that a literal reproduction of Wayne Manor isn’t all they should be doing. Alfred steps into the role of surrogate father to young Bruce, but his parenting style is less about providing direction as it is about providing re-direction when Bruce’s life has fallen off course. Throughout the film, it’s Alfred who is most keenly aware of the fact that Bruce is struggling to live up to his father’s legacy, and it’s Alfred who pushes him to embrace that legacy while still becoming his own man.

Michael Caine is phenomenal in BEGINS. Much life Michael Gough in the Burton/Schumacher Quadrilogy, he’s often the very best part of the movie. Caine oozes concern contained by his position, but he’s not afraid to speak his mind when he feels it’s absolutely necessary, though he usually tries to get his point across within the bounds of his professional position in the house. (This is my second favorite butler portrayal ever, after Anthony Hopkins in The Remains of the Day.) BEGINS needs Caine to be good because of Bruce’s desire to live up to his father’s legacy, and because his father is gone for most of the film. For that matter, Linus Roache is also exceptional in BEGINS – there’s never any reason to doubt that Bruce would want to live up to his father’s legacy whether Thomas Wayne was the richest man in Gotham or its poorest. It’s Alfred who first has to step out of his professional boundaries, and that gives him insight into helping Bruce step out of his self-imposed familial boundaries, even if he’s not always a fan of the way Bruce accomplishes this freedom.

The second and smaller point the Batcave expansion brings up is Bruce’s ancestor who used the caves as part of the Underground Railroad. What I like about this aspect is that it allows Bruce to plug into the Wayne’s family legacy in a private way. There’s been previous Waynes using the shadows to enact change, and Bruce is now part of that tradition, too.

Ra’s is the third father figure for Bruce in the film, and it’s Ra’s who teaches Bruce how to perfect his fighting skills and how to use theatricality for his benefit. Ra’s teaches him about the power of symbols, too, and so Bruce is the product not just of Thomas Wayne, but Alfred and Ra’s, as well. It’s critical that Bruce takes what he considers the best parts of each three parental figures, while rejecting that which doesn’t work. I think Nolan does a fantastic job of creating Bruce as his own man in what he adopts and rejects from these three dads. As adamantly as Bruce rejects Ra’s philosophy, he still embraces Ra’s skills.

Lucious Fox (an excellent Morgan Freeman) is sort of a father figure, too, but he’s the kind of grandfather who just gives you lots of presents and doesn’t ask too many questions, meaning he treats Bruce both like he’s a child and like he’s his own man.

Nolan is more interested in Bruce Wayne than he is Batman, and those are the better parts of the film. Christian Bale is very good as Bruce, only okay as Bats, but that’s partly a product of design, too. Look at the Bat costume – it’s totally black. Lucious gives him the suit (which was designed for military use) and it’s already black, and Bruce proceeds to paint it a deeper black. It’s a bit ironic that in creating a symbol for the city, Bruce chooses the most colorless outfit imaginable. There’s a Bat symbol on the chest, but it’s the exact same color as the rest of the suit; there’s no way, in the dark, anyone is going to see it. In fact, if you look at the costume, the only two non-black areas are the exposed parts of Bruce’s lower face and the gold utility belt. Why’s the belt gold and not the symbol?

One of Chris Nolan’s strengths as a director is the performances he gets from his actors, and there’s good performances all over BEGINS. I’ve touched on Caine, Roache, Bale, and Freeman, but Gary Oldman is every bit as great as Sergeant Jim Gordon, one of the few straight-laced cops on the Gotham police force. Bruce is drawn to Gordon because he’s not on the take, and even though there’s not a huge character arc for Gordon, Oldman makes me believe Gordon is a well-rounded character who’s caught in an impossible situation where his best chance to make a difference comes in believing in an impossible person.

Cillian Murphy is good as Dr. Jonathan Crane, but the Scarecrow is better. Nolan has said that no other superheroes exist in his world and so it’s important, I think, for the first super villain we experience in this universe is just a guy who puts on a simple mask that becomes scary because he douses you with chemicals. It helps play into the escalation of villains that we experience throughout the trilogy.

Tom Wilkinson excellent as Carmine Falcone is first presented as Gotham’s equivalent to the Kingpin, but his power becomes stripped and lessened as we move through the film. We learn that he’s being used by Ra’s to move drugs into the city and when he tries to make a power play with Dr. Crane (Ra’s middle man), the shrink douses him with toxin and turns him crazy.

Katie Holmes has taken a lot of heat for her performance, but I don’t think it’s a matter of her being awful as much as it is her inability to reach the heights of everyone else in the cast. It’s a bit unfair to even put her in this film because there’s no way she’s not going to get swallowed up by the talent around her.

I really like BATMAN BEGINS, but I like the Bruce Wayne portions more than the Batman sequences. Nolan does seem a bit uncomfortable here with the notion of superheroes – that someone would choose to put on a ridiculous costume and go out to willingly punch and kick people – but I do like what he does with that in terms of the purposeful construction of a cultural symbol that Bruce engages in. I love the scope of the film, and I prefer Bruce outside of Gotham to Bruce/Bats inside of Gotham. No one gets shots of buildings on mountain sides like Nolan, and it’s these scenes where Bruce has yet to even consider becoming Batman where everything works.

It’s certainly not a happy movie, though, as is best evidenced by Bruce’s decision to create a symbol of fear rather than hope. Bruce is not the kind of guy who wants to inspire through the bright and shiny like his father did; he’s the kind of guy who wants to inspire through darkness. It’s a very cynical take on heroes and what motivates individuals to become better people.

BATMAN BEGINS wasn’t wholly embraced when it was released back in 2005, and as of this writing it’s only the 14th highest grossing superhero film at the domestic box office. And in another couple of days it will be passed by THE DARK KNIGHT RISES, and drop into 15th place. To put BEGINS’ domestic box office performance into a bit of perspective – it’s total domestic gross was $205 million.

The Avengers did $207 million it’s opening weekend. And yes, Avengers has the benefit of 3D receipts, ticket inflation (though we’re talking a seven year gap, not seventy), and superhero movies now being the cool kid on the block, but we’re still talking about the opening weekend of Avengers doing more business than the entire domestic run of BEGINS.

That blows me away.

These are the superhero movies that did bigger box office that BATMAN BEGINS: Avengers, THE DARK KNIGHT, Spider-Man 1, 2, 3, Iron Man 1, 2, Incredibles, Batman, X-Men: The Last Stand, Amazing Spider-Man, Hancock, and X2. The much-maligned Superman Returns only did $5 million less than BEGINS, so to loop back to my original point, BEGINS is a much less seen and appreciated movie than DARK KNIGHT.

But it’s still a damn good movie and while I’m not going to fight anyone to the death arguing it’s better than DARK KNIGHT, I am always going to bang the drum for all the things that BATMAN BEGINS does right.