HAYWIRE: You Shouldn’t Think of Her As Being a Woman

Haywire (2011) – Directed by Steven Soderbergh – Starring Gina Carano, Michael Fassbender, Ewan McGregor, Bill Paxton, Channing Tatum, Antonio Banderas, and Michael Douglas.

“You shouldn’t think of her as being a woman. No, that would be a mistake.”

This is the line Kenneth (Ewan McGregor) says to hitman Paul (Michael Fassbender) when he’s trying to convince Paul to take the job to assassinate Mallory Kane (Gina Carano). “I’ve never done a woman before,” Paul had said to him, and this is Kenneth’s final pitch to get him to sign on.

It’s a problematic statement, of course, but it gets to the heart of the problem with HAYWIRE: What do we make of both Mallory Kane and the woman who plays her, Gina Carano? For Kenneth, the statement is both completely true and absolutely false. He completely thinks of Mallory as a woman because he used to be romantically involved with her, but he also absolutely thinks of her as an employee instead of a woman, and her decision to leave his employment will kill his business as she takes many of his clients with her. It’s a perfect storm of personal and professional debasement for Kenneth, and he’s looking to make Mallory pay for this by setting her up to take the fall for the death of a journalist. (The plot is needlessly convoluted, but we’ll get to that.)

This personal/professional divide haunts the Mallory Kane character throughout HAYWIRE because Soderbergh is willing to embrace her professionalism but not her personal feelings and desires. She is clearly at the top of the covert op game. Coblenz (Michael Douglas), a U.S. government official, insists that she be part of an operation he hires Kenneth’s private firm to complete, which tells us how highly she’s thought of, and why Kenneth is so upset that she’s about to bail on him. She’s the meal ticket.

Coblenz is the only purely professional relationship in the film. He represents that far end of the spectrum and her father (Bill Paxton) represents the far end of the personal section. In the middle we have ex-boyfriend Kenneth, who’s completely ensconced in both worlds, Aaron (Channing Tatum), who’s a professional associate that she hooks up with after a job, and Paul, who should be a professional-only contact, but their mission sees them playing a married couple, so it’s like Soderbergh wants to keep up this illusion of her as a part of a couple.

And that brings us to Soderbergh and Carano, and what makes me uneasy about HAYWIRE. The whole film comes out a bit creepy. Instead of coming off as the strong, sexy woman she is in real life, Carano feels a bit fetishized in HAYWIRE by Soderbergh. It just feels … off-putting to me that in a movie where Carano plays this top flight covert op, Soderbergh can’t get away from the fact that she’s a woman, too. She’s constantly wearing outfits that accentuate her sexiness, and while that is, by no means, a bad thing, it also feels like we’re supposed to be surprised when this incredibly sexy woman is also incredibly capable of kicking ass.

Which is silly because we’ve all been watching beautiful women kick ass for years, so why does it come off like Soderbergh is the one who finds this surprising?

In the Blu-Ray’s special features, Soderbergh talks about how he first became aware of Carano when he was watching MMA on CBS (he seemed very focused on the CBS thing, for some reason) and decided someone should build a movie around her. HAYWIRE is the result, but the film offers no more depth than you’d get from watching Carano fight on MMA. (On CBS, or otherwise.) It’s that back and forth between Carano being gorgeous and Carano kicking ass that emphasizes her physicality that bothers me because there’s no emotional counterweight. She even worries about having to play the gorgeous woman with Paul because she’s “not comfortable playing the dress,” which she means as not being comfortable playing the sidekick but comes across literally as her not being comfortable in a dress.

The structure of the film opens with Mallory fighting Aaron in a diner in upstate New York, and then semi-kidnapping a guy (he doesn’t seem to be complaining too much, perhaps because she’s a woman he tried to help when she was fighting with Aaron), who she then decides to tell her story to, because she wants someone to know her story so the truth can, at some level, get out. We get this whole, over-complex plot that’s told largely in flashback, but even though the story is thus told from Mallory’s perspective, she’s largely an empty shell of a character. She comes off as a professional, someone who’s more interested in their job than in the personal, which is fine, but since so much of the film is about how other people emote onto her, it would be nice to get a little something on how she emotes back. Or, if she doesn’t emote back fully, if there was a bit more about how she struggles to emote back, because she just seems to mirror Kenneth and Aaron’s emotional states back to them.

The best scene of the film is when Mallory is killing people in her dad’s house and her father sees her in action down a darkened hallway. Paxton’s face is a mix of emotions; even though he knows what his daughter does, he’s never seen her in action and now he’s watching her in a hand-to-hand, fight to the death battle.

As an actress, Carano is limited, but that’s not surprising given that this is her first film. She’s not bad by any stretch, but HAYWIRE doesn’t ask her to talk a whole lot, which adds to that sense that she’s simply an object for us to watch. Not knowing a whole lot about her, I had a feeling the fight scenes would be good because of her MMA background (and they are brutally fantastic), but even though I’d seen he before, I was a bit take aback at how amazing she looks on film. In some scenes she looks a bit like Rachel Weisz and in others she’s definitely giving off an Asia Argento vibe, but in all scenes she’s Gina Carrano, and the camera simply adores her.

I’m left feeling like Soderbergh let Carano down here, which is a silly and stupid thing to say since she’s only here because of him, but I feel like HAWYWIRE is simply a movie with more style than substance. Because it’s a Soderbergh film he can get Antonio Banderas, Michael Douglas, Channing Tatum, Bill Paxton, and Paul Fassbender to show up for small roles, but this adds to the fact that none of these characters really feel all that real. They’re ideas, they’re types, but they’re not people.

The script also lets the film down by an overly complex infodump at the end of the film that tries to do the whole, “you thought this guy was the bad guy but this guy is the good guy, and vice versa” bits that’s just not necessary.

Stylistically, then, I’m a fan of HAWYWIRE (the movie has a slick look, and David Holmes’ score is phenomenal), but if you told me right now that I can only watch Carano’s next film or Soderbergh’s next film, I’d pick Carano’s. Soderbergh should deliver something more than a beautiful surface and he doesn’t. On the other hand, Carano has the on-screen presence to have a career in the film business. While her speaking parts are the weakest aspect of her performance in HAYWIRE, the special features segment on her dedication to training, and the glowing way everyone (trainers and fellow actors) talked about her willingness to learn, and take and apply criticism, speaks well of her chances of improving.

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – GHOST PROTOCOL: Jump!

Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol (2011) – Directed by Brad Bird – Starring Tom Cruise, Jeremy Renner, Paula Patton, Simon Pegg, Michael Nykvist, Léa Seydoux, Vladimir Mashkov, Samuli Edelmann, Anil Kapoor, Tom Wilkinson, Josh Holloway, Ving Rhames, and Michelle Monaghan.

It’s a bit hard to say which is the more unbelievable feat regarding MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – GHOST PROTOCOL, the continued, strong existence of this franchise or that a film could be this deftly directed by a guy known for doing animation.

PROTOCOL is a very good, very slick, rather clever espionage flick, but I’d be lying if I said the expectation game didn’t leave me feeling a little underwhelmed. This film is getting amazingly good press and one review I read said this was the best action film since Casino Royale.

Eh … let’s agree with that for a moment. Let us say that it is the best action flick since Daniel Craig first started taking orders from M. PROTOCOL is good, but there’s an ocean between how good this film is and how great that film remains. I also think it pales a bit in comparison to MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE 3, but not by enough of a margin for me to feel like this film is a letdown.

GHOST PROTOCOL is a good film, well worth watching, and highly enjoyable from the opening frame to the last. Tom Cruise, Simon Pegg, Paula Patton, and Jeremy Renner comprise this edition of Ethan Hunt’s IMF team, and while three of the four have some ghosts in their closets to deal with, they largely stay focused on the task at hand. It’s a kinda brilliant example of the ability of these agents to compartmentalize their demons. Hunt (Cruise) was in a Russian prison for killing six Serbians who killed his wife. Jane Carter (Patton) is dealing with the loss of her team partner and apparent lover, Sawyer from LOST (Josh Holloway), who was shot by a a sexy cute assassin named Sabine Moreau (Léa Seydoux).

Meanwhile, Ethan is in a Russian prison and so Carter and Benji (Pegg) break him out. The film bored me a bit through this part. As a prison extraction sequence it’s not bad, it establishes that Ethan is a good guy because he goes and rescues a Russian prisoner to take him along, and it provides some good comic relief between Ethan and Benji, but I always get a bit peeved at elongated sequences that establish what we know will happen from the trailer. If the whole marketing campaign is going to be built around the idea that Ethan and IMF are disavowed by the U.S. government, then let’s get to it. The whole bit with Sawy- sorry, Hannaway getting shot and Ethan breaking out of prison just takes too long to get through, because then we’ve got to sit through the opening titles, Ethan leading a break-in at the Kremlin, the Kremlin getting blown up, Ethan waking up in a hospital, Ethan escaping from the hospital, Ethan getting told by the IMF Head (Tom Wilkinson) that Ghost Protocol has been issued, the Head’s limo getting shot, the Head getting killed, and Ethan and analyst William Brandt (Jeremy Renner) escaping.

That’s a whole lot of sitting through stuff just to get to what the film tells us in the title and the trailer has been promising for months.

None of it is necessarily bad, though some of the bits (such as Ethan and Benji using a projector screen to fool a single guard inside the Kremlin) go on too long, but it’s not necessarily all that hot, either. There’s so little here that’s unique that it’s good without being memorable or really engaging. Pegg’s humor is the best part of the pre-ghosting; he’s a field agent now and adds some much-needed levity to all the action. There’s a nice bit of rapport between Ethan and Russian agent Sidorov (Vladimir Mashkov ) during Ethan’s escape, and it’s this moment, I suppose, when the film starts pushing hard in the right direction.

I could break down all of the plot points for you, but it’s a spy movie. There’s bad guys trying to destroy the world. There’s lots of foreign locales. There’s lots of exciting action.

Here’s what’s important – the interaction between the four leads is really good. The bad guy is a complete contrivance. The stunts are top notch. The much ballyhooed sequence in Dubai is very strong, from the moment Ethan begins climbing the world’s tallest building to the sandstorm chase through the city. Director Brad Bird keeps this film humming along, and the physicality of the action is intense. When Ethan’s jump into an open window is too high, he slams his head into the glass with such ferocity that I felt my own head snap back. Cars slam into each other with all the sounds the theater’s system can handle. Everything is fast and assured through the Dubai sequence in terms of action.

That leads to the strongest story point of the film; since everyone has some kind of personal issue to deal with, these skeletons come out every now and then, but once a decision has been reached, these agents act like pros. They’re capable, able to think on the fly, and able to overcome their own mistakes. In short, this is a fabulous team that Bird has assembled here, and the paces he puts them through is highly enjoyable.

GHOST PROTOCOL is one of those films that’s good without being great; there’s nothing wrong with it, but it doesn’t move me like Casino Royale or The Bourne Ultimatum or Die Hard. It is a visual feast, though, full of great sequences and great characters. It takes a bit too long to get going, and the villain’s plot could be taken from any movie since the Russians first had nuclear capability (it’s another launch code movie – really, they’re still pumping out Russian nuclear launch code plots). It’s a bit of a shame that while Michael Nyqvist’s most well-known role is in the theaters right now being played by Daniel Craig in David Fincher’s version of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, he’s here playing an awful, cardboard James Bond villain ever.

It’s the relationship between Ethan and the other three agents that makes the film really work, though. Ethan moves through a stage with each of them: Benji in the first third, Carter in the second, and Renner in the film’s epilogue. Cruise exudes total confidence and experience here; this may seem a strange thing to say about an actor with the resume of Cruise, but there’s a real sense in this film that he’s reached some new level of attainment. He’s confident and assured, but also easy going and willing to laugh at himself. It’s one of his better performances, and ultimately it’s what puts GHOST PROTOCOL over the top.